Key result
Post-MI VSR with cardiogenic shock is linked to ~43% higher in-hospital mortality versus predominant LVF.
Why the study?
Cardiogenic shock is often seen with ventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction, and mortality remains high despite surgical therapy.
Does ventricular septal rupture compared to predominant left ventricular failure increase in-hospital mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=939)
Does ventricular septal rupture compared to predominant left ventricular failure increase in-hospital mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 87% vs 61%
p-value: p=<0.001
Ventricular septal rupture complicating acute MI with cardiogenic shock is associated with an extremely high in-hospital mortality (87%), significantly worse than shock from predominant LV failure, though surgery remains the best therapeutic option.
Authors
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
VSR in post-MI cardiogenic shock associates with higher mortality than LV failure; leaves open optimal timing of intervention.
Menon et al. (2000) conducted an observational in Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (n=939). Ventricular septal rupture vs. Predominant left ventricular failure was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=<0.001). Ventricular septal rupture with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction was associated with higher in-hospital mortality than predominant left ventricular failure (87% vs 61%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: