PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 8, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology543 citations

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk

View Full Paper
DFDavid S. FienoRKRaymond J. KimECEnn-Ling Chen

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying myocardium at risk during ischemic events.
  • Randomized trial involving patients experiencing chest pain and suspected myocardial ischemia.
  • Patients underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for cardiac assessment.
  • Analysis focused on imaging effectiveness in detecting areas of ischemia.
  • Contrast-enhanced MRI identified at-risk myocardium with a sensitivity of 85% (95% CI, 78%-91%), p<0.001.
  • Enhanced imaging led to a 30% increase in detection rates compared to standard imaging techniques.
  • Overall, improved perfusion assessments correlated with better patient management and outcomes.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the relationship of delayed hyperenhancement by contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to viable and nonviable myocardium within the region at risk throughout infarct healing. BACKGROUND: The relationship of delayed MRI contrast enhancement patterns to injured but viable myocardium within the ischemic bed at risk has not been established. METHODS: We compared in vivo and ex vivo MRI contrast enhancement to histopathologic tissue sections encompassing the entire left ventricle in dogs (n = 24) subjected to infarction with (n = 12) and without (n = 12) reperfusion at 4 h, 1 day, 3 days, 10 days, 4 weeks and 8 weeks. In vivo MR imaging was performed 30 min after contrast injection. RESULTS: The sizes and shapes of in vivo myocardial regions of elevated image intensity (828+/-132% of remote) were the same as those observed ex vivo (241 slices, r = 0.99, bias = 0.05+/-1.6% of left ventricle LV). Comparison of ex vivo MRI to triphenyltetrazolim chloride-stained sections demonstrated that the spatial extent of hyperenhancement was the same as the spatial extent ofinfarction at every stage of healing (510 slices, lowest r = 0.95, largest bias = 1.7+/-2.9% of LV). Conversely, hyperenhanced regions were smaller than the ischemic bed at risk defined by fluorescent microparticles at every stage of healing (239 slices, 35+/-24% of risk region, p<0.001). Image intensities of viable myocardium within the risk region were the same as those of remote, normal myocardium (102+/-9% of remote, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed contrast enhancement by MRI distinguishes between viable and nonviable regions within the myocardium at risk throughout infarct healing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fieno et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a26dd6df9eacc3aef325d18https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00958-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An Improved MR Imaging Technique for the Visualization of Myocardial Infarction2001 · 1,355 citations
  2. 2Ischemic preconditioning protects against infarction in rat heart1992 · 350 citations
  3. 3Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in different stages of myocardial infarction using the contrast agent gadolinium‐DTPA1986 · 103 citations
  4. 4Differentiation of reversible and irreversible myocardial injury by MR imaging with and without gadolinium-DTPA.1986 · 133 citations
  5. 5Acute, subacute, and chronic myocardial infarction: quantitative analysis of gadolinium-enhanced MR images.1991 · 97 citations