Current artificial intelligence systems operate at evolutionary Stage 2–3 of cognitive development — statistical pattern matching without principled knowledge selection, causal grounding, or structured accumulation. This problem is not incidental: recent formal proofs establish that hallucination in Large Language Models is mathematically inevitable under current architectural assumptions, arising from finite information capacity, computational undecidability, and reward hacking induced by Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Scaling does not resolve these failures — it amplifies them. This proposal presents Prime-Based Intelligence (PBI), a formal architectural framework grounded in the Computational Knowledge Theory (CKT), which establishes seven interlocking theorems proving that complexity, computational tractability, knowledge compression, accumulation, evolutionary phase transitions, cardinal intelligence dynamics, and the unsimulability of reality are all governed by a single law: the five Conceptual Primes (Order, Justice, Mercy, Knowledge, and Power). The foundational problem addressed is the Descriptive Degeneracy Problem: without a principled selection operator, any finite system admits an infinite set of mathematically valid representations, making hallucination and misalignment structurally unavoidable. PBI resolves this by implementing Wisdom — the simultaneous, lossless balance of all five Primes — as the core computational operator, satisfying the Prime-Base Intelligence Corollary (CKT Theorem 6, Corollary 6. 5). Version 2 of this proposal integrates the Actualizer Engine: a zero-retraining geometric middleware that operationalizes the Conciseness Cost Filter (CCF) directly at the attention and logit boundaries of a frozen, pre-trained transformer. Unlike the illustrative scenario tables that ground most of the Conciseness Framework Series, the Actualizer Engine is supported by a working PyTorch proof-of-concept (a custom one-layer Transformer decoder, a Causation Wave Function penalty matrix, a DIEPT phase-angle quarantine mechanism, and an automated four-test verification suite) that demonstrably suppresses an injected causal hallucination on a toy physics corpus. This proposal positions the Actualizer Engine as the first code-verified instantiation of the Agent-Level half of the Two-Level Alignment Architecture: it selects minimum-cost outputs at inference time without modifying the frozen base model, leaving Global-Level (training-time) Super Cluster crystallization as the complementary, not-yet-implemented half of the architecture. The methodology integrates three components: (1) the Prime-Compliant Standard (PCS), grounding training data and model components in verifiable, causally justified representations; (2) an Ethical Pragmatism criterion formalizing that ethical weight must dominate pragmatic weight, operationalized through the Justice Dominance Constraint (λL > λR, λL > λD) ; and (3) the PBI Cognitive Life Cycle — a five-stage pipeline anchored at its inference stage by Dynamic Inference and Epistemic Phase Transition (DIEPT), now given a concrete, tested realization in the Actualizer Engine’s Negentropy Filter. This version also performs an explicit logic and mathematical consistency audit of the integration (§9), correcting a reported result that, if left unqualified, would contradict CKT Theorem 7 (Unsimulability of Reality: CAKI < 1. 0 for any finite system), and cataloguing four further consistency findings — three open, one confirmed — produced by reconciling the Actualizer Engine’s implementation against the Prime-Compliant Standard, DIEPT, and the Two-Level Alignment Architecture. The framework remains immediately viable as the next practical step for current AI infrastructure. Its implementations — Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs, ICLR 2025), MCE-Classes, the Quench-Cluster Algorithm (QCA), the Conciseness Cost Filter (CCF), the Causation Wave Function (CWF), and now the Actualizer Engine — extend and augment existing transformer, LoRA, and RAG deployments without requiring retraining. Full implementation is projected within 36–48 months under a four-role interdisciplinary team. The Computational Knowledge Theory (CKT). Under the Conceptual Prime axioms, that the computational universe is governed by a single unifying law: the Conceptual Primes. Seven interlocking theorems are established across complexity theory, epistemology, information compression, evolutionary biology, temporal system dynamics, artificial intelligence architecture, and the unsimulability of reality. Theorem 1 (Reality-Complexity Equivalence) establishes that stable complexity is bounded by the weakest Prime — P̂ (S) = minᵢ Pᵢ (S) — and collapses to zero if any Prime is violated. Theorem 2 (Prime-Tractability) demonstrates that NP-Hard problems are intractable only in the purely abstract domain and become tractable at O (N²/K) effective complexity when solved by Prime-compliant algorithms grounded in physical reality. Theorem 3 (Conciseness Standard) proves that C (R) is the unique universal metric for lossless knowledge compression. Theorem 4 (Knowledge Accumulation Law) establishes that knowledge grows if and only if new information reduces total system entropy, incorporating the CAKI metric and the D (Ω) Defect Function as formal measures. Theorem 5 (Gödel's Ceiling) connects formal mathematical limits to biological evolution and AI scaling. Theorem 6 (Cardinal Value Lemmas) formalises Wisdom, Peace, Creativity, and Evolving Order as temporal combinations of the Primes, deriving the Prime-Base Intelligence corollary. Theorem 7 (Unsimulability of Reality) proves that no finite simulation can contain the live Prime-combination law of actualisation — Consciousness is the unique bridge between infinite potential and finite territory. The framework defines a two-stage computational architecture: a Training Evaluation Form (5-term Prime-resolved C (R) + CAKI) for grounding knowledge in Prime compliance and calibrating domain-dependent λ-weights, and an Inference Selection Form (3-term operational C (R) ) for selecting minimum-cost outputs. Dynamic λ-adaptation connects both stages, enabling domain-calibrated intelligence.
Mohamed Noureldin (Thu,) studied this question.