PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1993Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis30 citations

Can an intracoronary doppler wire accurately measure changes in coronary blood flow velocity?

View Full Paper
JVJozef VanyiTBTerry R. BowersGJGary A. Jarvis

Key Result

A newly developed Doppler guide wire yielded similar results to a validated Doppler catheter for measuring coronary blood flow velocity and flow reserve in anesthetized dogs.

Structured PICO

Does a newly developed Doppler guide wire accurately measure changes in coronary blood flow velocity and coronary flow reserve compared to a validated Doppler catheter in anesthetized dogs?

P
Population
10 anesthetized dogs undergoing sequential measurements of coronary blood flow velocity and coronary flow reserve.
I
Intervention
Newly developed Doppler guide wire
C
Comparator
Previously extensively validated Doppler catheter
O
Outcome
Coronary blood flow velocity (CBFV) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) in response to graded doses of intracoronary adenosinesurrogate

A newly developed Doppler guide wire provides similar measurements of coronary blood flow velocity and flow reserve as a validated Doppler catheter in a canine model, potentially facilitating measurements during diagnostic angiography.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare a newly developed Doppler guide wire in the measurement of coronary blood flow velocity (CBFV) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) when compared to a previously extensively validated Doppler catheter. Sequential measurements of Doppler signals from the Doppler catheter and wire were obtained in response to graded doses of intracoronary adenosine in the left circumflex of 10 anesthetized dogs. The Doppler catheter signal was recorded on a standard physiologic chart recorder; that from the Doppler wire was recorded both on the chart recorder and the commercially available spectral analysis recording system. High correlations were obtained between the change in coronary velocity and CFR which were independent of the recording system used. Peak flow reserve in response to maximum intracoronary adenosine (24 micrograms bolus) ranged from 3.7-5.6 x basal. These results are similar to those obtained in normal humans. In spite of major differences between engineering specifications of the Doppler wire and Doppler catheter, under optimal conditions these two techniques yield similar results. The Doppler wire may facilitate measurements of CFR during diagnostic angiography in small or diffusely diseased vessels.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vanyi et al. (1993) studied this question. Doppler guide wire vs. Doppler catheter was evaluated on Measurement of coronary blood flow velocity (CBFV) and coronary flow reserve (CFR). A newly developed Doppler guide wire yielded similar results to a validated Doppler catheter for measuring coronary blood flow velocity and flow reserve in anesthetized dogs.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4c428a028ea97264ab76e4https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810290314
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The pulsed Doppler coronary artery catheter preliminary report of a new technique for measuring rapid changes in coronary artery flow velocity in man.1977 · 185 citations
  2. 2Measurements of coronary velocity and reactive hyperemia in the coronary circulation of humans.1981 · 280 citations
  3. 3Hot film coronary artery velocity measurements in horses1976 · 49 citations
  4. 4An ultrasonic pulsed Doppler system for measuring blood flow in small vessels.1974 · 356 citations
  5. 5Analysis of flow characteristics in poststenotic regions of the human coronary artery during bypass graft surgery.1987 · 108 citations