Manned–unmanned teaming (MUMT) represents a critical evolution in collaborative operations across domains including search and rescue, firefighting, surveillance, and defense. Despite widespread interest in MUMT capabilities, the field lacks a unified taxonomy for classifying and comparing system capabilities, hindering systematic development and technology integration. This paper presents a comprehensive framework for MUMT that addresses the fundamental challenge of organizing and assessing cognitive agent capabilities within human–machine teams. Building upon established automation frameworks, we propose a three-dimensional framework comprising information analysis and inference, decision-making, and action execution. Each dimension defines six hierarchical levels of teaming, ranging from human-only operations to fully autonomous cognitive agent capabilities. The framework distinguishes itself from existing taxonomies by explicitly modeling collaborative teaming rather than simple task delegation, incorporating transparency requirements, and addressing dynamic authority relationships between humans and cognitive agents. The proposed taxonomy provides researchers and engineers with a common vocabulary for MUMT development, enables gap analysis for technology roadmaps, and facilitates the identification of integration opportunities across organizational boundaries.
Athanasiadou et al. (Mon,) studied this question.