Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based support systems are transforming the educational landscape by enhancing teaching efficiency, personalized learning, and accessibility. Despite rapid technological progress, educational institutions face persistent challenges such as unequal access to quality learning resources, limited teacher support, and the need for individualized student engagement. These issues hinder effective learning outcomes and inclusivity in modern classrooms. This study presents a comprehensive literature review and a methodology grounded in constructivist learning theory to develop an AI-based educational support framework. The study is situated within the context of a higher education course integrating AI-supported learning. The proposed framework is developed by synthesizing theoretical and empirical evidence and is subsequently evaluated by experts in educational technology and artificial intelligence. Data are collected through structured expert questionnaires and qualitative feedback. Quantitative data are analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative responses are examined through thematic analysis to inform framework refinement. The study adheres to established ethical principles, including informed consent, voluntary participation, confidentiality, anonymity, and secure data management. Moreover, the paper explores the design and implementation of sustainable and AI-based educational support systems that address these challenges through intelligent tutoring, adaptive learning analytics, and automated feedback mechanisms. By integrating natural language processing, machine learning, and predictive modelling, the proposed framework provides real-time assistance to educators and learners, fostering data-driven decision-making and inclusive pedagogy. Qualitative expert evaluation suggests that an AI-based educational support framework has the potential to improve teaching support, learner engagement, and personalized learning while providing a scalable and equitable approach for higher education.
Gudonienė et al. (Fri,) studied this question.