PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 25, 2019Clinical Kidney Journal29 citationsOpen Access

The assessment of coronary artery disease in patients with end-stage renal disease

View Full Paper
FPFederica PoliGGGaurav S. GulsinGMGerry P McCann

Key Result

Traditional imaging modalities have limited diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value for cardiac events and survival in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD)
E
Exposure
Various imaging techniques for coronary artery disease screening

This review highlights the limitations of traditional imaging modalities for CAD screening in ESRD patients and discusses the need for refined risk prediction.

Limitations

  • Lack of randomized clinical trial evidence in this population
  • Current practice is informed by observational data with a significant potential for bias

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Clustering of traditional atherosclerotic and non-traditional risk factors drive the excess rates of coronary and non-coronary CVD in patients with ESRD. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a key disease process, present in ∼50% of the haemodialysis population ≥65 years of age. Patients with ESRD are more likely to be asymptomatic, posing a challenge to the correct identification of CAD, which is essential for appropriate risk stratification and management. Given the lack of randomized clinical trial evidence in this population, current practice is informed by observational data with a significant potential for bias. For this reason, the most appropriate approach to the investigation of CAD is the subject of considerable discussion, with practice patterns largely varying between different centres. Traditional imaging modalities are limited in their diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value for cardiac events and survival in patients with ESRD, demonstrated by the large number of adverse cardiac outcomes among patients with negative test results. This review focuses on the current understanding of CAD screening in the ESRD population, discussing the available evidence for the use of various imaging techniques to refine risk prediction, with an emphasis on their strengths and limitations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Poli et al. (2019) conducted a review in End-stage renal disease and coronary artery disease. Coronary artery disease screening and imaging techniques was evaluated. Traditional imaging modalities have limited diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value for cardiac events and survival in patients with end-stage renal disease.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a626950b3ffb27a727ddc7dhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfz088
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cardiac troponin I, cardiac troponin T, and creatine kinase MB in dialysis patients without ischemic heart disease: evidence of cardiac troponin T expression in skeletal muscle1997 · 219 citations
  2. 2Measurement of Fractional Flow Reserve to Assess the Functional Severity of Coronary-Artery Stenoses1996 · 2,317 citations
  3. 3Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris2004 · 407 citations
  4. 4Noninvasive Diagnosis of Ischemia-Induced Wall Motion Abnormalities With the Use of High-Dose Dobutamine Stress MRI1999 · 788 citations
  5. 5Physical exercise among participants in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS): correlates and associated outcomes2010 · 336 citations