PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 8, 2025Frontiers in Neurology0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of the prehospital diagnostic accuracy of a novel point-of-care test for NT-proBNP, D-dimer and H-FABP and large-vessel occlusion risk assessment (LVOCheck-EVA): a protocol for a multicenter prospective observational study in patients suspected of having a stroke

KRKian RöhrsMKMaximilian KaffesFBFulvio Bondi

Key Result

This study protocol outlines a planned observational trial to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the LVOCheck point-of-care biomarker test for prehospital prediction of large-vessel occlusion in suspected stroke patients.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=800)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does the LVOCheck point-of-care test accurately predict large-vessel occlusion in patients with suspected stroke in a prehospital setting?

P
Population
A planned multicenter prospective observational study of 800 adult patients with suspected acute stroke within 24 hours of symptom onset to evaluate a prehospital point-of-care biomarker test.
E
Exposure
LVOCheck device, a multiplex point-of-care test measuring NT-proBNP, D-Dimer, and H-FABP from whole-blood, integrated with patient-specific clinical data via a Mobile App to predict large-vessel occlusion (LVO) risk.
C
Comparator
Standard clinical information alone / gold-standard final hospital diagnosis.
O
Outcome
Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of LVOCheck to predict LVO probability, evaluated against the gold-standard final hospital diagnosis.surrogate

This study protocol describes a prospective observational trial to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a novel prehospital point-of-care biomarker test for identifying large-vessel occlusion in suspected stroke patients.

Limitations

  • The biomarker panel has limited ability to differentiate ischemia from intracerebral hemorrhage

Abstract

Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of permanent disability in adults and one of the most time-sensitive emergencies in modern medicine. Rapid diagnosis and initiation of thrombolytic therapy, as well as immediate access to mechanical thrombectomy for patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO), are critical determinants of favorable outcomes. While Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) - ambulances equipped with computed tomography (CT) imaging - have demonstrated efficacy in improving outcomes, their deployment is often constrained to urban environments due to cost-efficiency considerations. Blood biomarkers offer a potentially cost-effective alternative for stroke diagnosis and subtyping. Especially for patients with LVO, a prehospital biomarker-based identification could enable a streamlined transport strategy directly to thrombectomy-capable stroke centers. In this study, we evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of a novel point-of-care test (POCT) in predicting LVO stroke, along with the levels of vascular biomarkers-NT-proBNP, D-Dimer, and H-FABP-from ultra-early whole-blood samples of patients with suspected stroke in a prehospital setting. The test integrates a blood-based multiplex lateral flow assay (LFA) with clinical decision support (CDS) software, accessible through a Mobile Application (App). The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00037840). Methods and analysis: This multicenter prospective observational study will include 800 patients with suspected stroke, enrolled within 24 h after symptom onset. Participants will be recruited at three Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) sites in Berlin, Germany. Prehospital blood samples will be analyzed directly in the ambulance using the LVOCheck device. The test achieves its performance by quantifying the blood levels of the vascular biomarkers (NT-proBNP, D-Dimer, and H-FABP), and inputting these concentrations, along with neurological assessment score and patient-specific medical information such as age and blood pressure, to output predictive information on the probability of LVO stroke, together with all the input data. Additional clinical data, including final diagnoses, will be documented in electronic case report forms (eCRFs). The diagnostic performance of LVOCheck will be evaluated through comprehensive statistical analysis of the combined biomarker and clinical data, including assessment of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive models. Discussion: This real-world study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and feasibility (including human factors and usability) of LVOCheck, a portable, non-invasive multiplex POCT at prehospital settings, such as an ambulance, in the prediction of acute LVO diagnosis and triage of suspected acute LVO stroke patients. Utilizing Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) as recruiting sites enables the analysis of ultra-early biomarker levels from prehospital whole-blood samples combined with patient-specific medical information to provide a predictive risk of LVO stroke. A cost-effective and practical POCT could provide additional biochemical information to support prehospital LVO identification in the future, thereby potentially assisting emergency medical services in transport decisions regarding direct transfer to thrombectomy-capable centers. This may improve triage efficiency, treatment metrics and outcomes in both urban and rural settings. Clinical trial registration: https://www.drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00037840/details, Identifier DRKS00037840.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Röhrs et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Suspected acute stroke (n=800). LVOCheck point-of-care test vs. Final hospital diagnosis was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) for predicting large-vessel occlusion. This study protocol outlines a planned observational trial to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the LVOCheck point-of-care biomarker test for prehospital prediction of large-vessel occlusion in suspected stroke patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a65797e66784dc805f71b80https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1697711
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper