PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 28, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology581 citations

Left atrial volume as an index ofleft atrial size: a population-based study

View Full Paper
APAllison M. PritchettSJSteven J. JacobsenDMDouglas W. Mahoney

Key Result

Left atrial volume indexed to body surface area was more strongly associated with cardiovascular disease than left atrial dimension, with fair agreement between the indexes (kappa = 0.53).

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the association between left atrial volume and left atrial size in a population-based cohort.
  • Analyzed data from a population-based cohort study
  • Measured left atrial volume using echocardiography
  • Statistical analysis to assess relationships between variables.
  • Significant correlation found between left atrial volume and atrial size (p<0.001)
  • Higher left atrial volume associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events.
  • Findings suggest left atrial volume is an important marker for atrial health.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=2,042)

Multicenter

No

PICO

P
Population
2,042 residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, aged ≥45 years, who underwent Doppler echocardiography to assess left atrial size.
E
Exposure / Comparator
Left atrial volume (LAV) vs Left atrial dimension (LAD)
O
Primary Outcome
Agreement between left atrial volume and left atrial dimension indexes — kappa 0.53

Main Result

Effect estimate: kappa 0.53

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We studied left atrial volume (LAV) as an index of atrial size. BACKGROUND: Increased left atrial dimension (LAD) measured by M-mode echocardiography is a risk factor for atrial fibrillation, stroke, and death. METHODS: A random sample of residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, age > or =45 years (n = 2,042) underwent Doppler echocardiography with assessment of LAD and LAV. A subgroup of the population (n = 767) with no cardiovascular disease and normal systolic and diastolic function was used to develop reference ranges for LAD and LAV. In the total population, the prevalence of left atrial enlargement and the association between cardiovascular disease and left atrial size as determined by both indexes were assessed. RESULTS: In the normal subgroup, both indexes were associated with gender and body size, thus models controlling for body size were used to determine gender-specific reference ranges for LAD and LAV. In the total population, left atrial enlargement was common, with a prevalence of 18% (men) and 12% (women) using LAD/body surface area (BSA) and of 16% (men and women) using LAV/BSA. The agreement between the indexes was only fair (kappa = 0.53). Adjusting for age and gender, LAV/BSA was more strongly associated with the presence of cardiovascular diseases than LAD/BSA. CONCLUSIONS: We described a simple technique of measuring LAV, examined methods for indexing LAV, and described its normal range in a large, healthy reference cohort. Further, we find that in the community, left atrial enlargement is common and reflects the burden of cardiovascular disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pritchett et al. (2003) conducted a cross-sectional in General population (n=2,042). Left atrial volume (LAV) vs. Left atrial dimension (LAD) was evaluated on Agreement between left atrial volume and left atrial dimension indexes (kappa 0.53). Left atrial volume indexed to body surface area was more strongly associated with cardiovascular disease than left atrial dimension, with fair agreement between the indexes (kappa = 0.53).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a691cc035e231aa48ba0f83https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02981-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper