Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Orthopedic trauma remains a critical challenge in modern healthcare, often resulting in severe mobility limitations, acute pain, and delayed recovery. Conventional rehabilitation techniques, though effective, fail to address the individualized, high-precision interventions needed for musculoskeletal injuries like fractures, joint instability, ligament tears, and muscular atrophy. Virtual reality (VR) technologies, such as Apple Vision Pro and HTC Vive Pro, offer a transformative approach by enhancing diagnostic precision, rehabilitation effectiveness, and patient engagement through interactive, immersive environments that improve clinical outcomes. These VR technologies provide real-time biomechanical data, such as joint mechanics, muscle coordination, and movement patterns, allowing clinicians to design personalized rehabilitation programs. These technologies can thus facilitate neuromuscular re-education, improve muscle proprioception, and enhance muscle coordination. Studies have shown that VR-based rehabilitation advances functional recovery, improves pain management, and reduces psychological barriers associated with immobility. VR also facilitates telemedicine, increasing accessibility for patients with geographic or mobility issues. However, while VR may provide biomechanical data, it is important to note that they fall short in accurate motion tracking, particularly in fine motor control tasks. This scoping review follows PRISMA guidelines to explore the potential of VR in orthopedic rehabilitation, analyzing its diagnostic capabilities, personalized interventions, and real-time feedback systems. Despite this, barriers remain, including regulatory challenges, limitations in haptic feedback, high cost, and patient compliance. By presenting a balanced perspective on the landscape of VR in orthopedic care, this paper emphasizes the need for rigorous clinical validation, regulatory advancements, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Ultimately, VR offers the potential to significantly improve recovery outcomes, enhance patient engagement, and streamline rehabilitation protocols, but its successful integration into clinical practice must be approached with both optimism and caution.
Paladugu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.