PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 9, 2014Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology50 citations

Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban in the Patients Undergoing the Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

View Full Paper
TNTomoyuki NagaoYIYasuya IndenMSMasayuki Shimano

Key Result

Uninterrupted periprocedural apixaban during atrial fibrillation ablation was associated with similar rates of major bleeding (1% vs 1%) and thromboembolic complications (0% vs 0.4%) as warfarin.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=342)

Structured PICO

Does uninterrupted apixaban prevent bleeding and thromboembolic complications compared to uninterrupted warfarin in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
342 consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation who received uninterrupted periprocedural anticoagulation with apixaban or warfarin.
E
Exposure
Apixaban for uninterrupted periprocedural anticoagulation
C
Comparator
Warfarin for uninterrupted periprocedural anticoagulation
O
Outcome
Occurrence of bleeding and thromboembolic complications during the procedural periodsafety

Uninterrupted apixaban appears to be as safe and effective as uninterrupted warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 1% vs 1%

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Apixaban, a factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor, is a new oral anticoagulant for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, little is known about its efficacy and safety as a periprocedural anticoagulant therapy for patients who had undergone catheter ablation (CA) for AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 342 consecutive patients who underwent CA for AF between April 2013 and March 2014 and received apixaban (n = 105) and warfarin (n = 237) for uninterrupted periprocedural anticoagulation. We retrospectively investigated the occurrence of bleeding and thromboembolic complications during the procedural period and compared them between the apixaban group (AG) and warfarin group (WG). Thromboembolic complications occurred in one (0.4%) patient in the WG. Major and minor bleeding complications occurred in one (1%) and four (4%) patients in the AG, and three (1%) and 12 (5%) patients in the WG. No significant difference in complications was observed between the AG and WG. Of importance, adverse event rates did not differ between the two groups after adjusting by a propensity score analysis. In preoperative tests of blood coagulation, there were significant differences in the prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, FXa activity, and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1+2) levels between the AG and WG. CONCLUSION: The use of apixaban during the periprocedural period of AF ablation seemed as efficacious and safe as warfarin.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nagao et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=342). Apixaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Major bleeding complications. Uninterrupted periprocedural apixaban during atrial fibrillation ablation was associated with similar rates of major bleeding (1% vs 1%) and thromboembolic complications (0% vs 0.4%) as warfarin.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6b750f56128ae23fcb428ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12553
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper