Key result
Uninterrupted periprocedural apixaban during atrial fibrillation ablation was associated with similar rates of major bleeding (1% vs 1%) and thromboembolic complications (0% vs 0.4%) as warfarin.
Why the study?
Does uninterrupted apixaban prevent bleeding and thromboembolic complications compared to uninterrupted warfarin in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=342)
Does uninterrupted apixaban prevent bleeding and thromboembolic complications compared to uninterrupted warfarin in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 1% vs 1%
Uninterrupted apixaban appears to be as safe and effective as uninterrupted warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation.
Supports uninterrupted apixaban as alternative to warfarin in AF ablation; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: Apixaban, a factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor, is a new oral anticoagulant for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, little is known about its efficacy and safety as a periprocedural anticoagulant therapy for patients who had undergone catheter ablation (CA) for AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 342 consecutive patients who underwent CA for AF between April 2013 and March 2014 and received apixaban (n = 105) and warfarin (n = 237) for uninterrupted periprocedural anticoagulation. We retrospectively investigated the occurrence of bleeding and thromboembolic complications during the procedural period and compared them between the apixaban group (AG) and warfarin group (WG). Thromboembolic complications occurred in one (0.4%) patient in the WG. Major and minor bleeding complications occurred in one (1%) and four (4%) patients in the AG, and three (1%) and 12 (5%) patients in the WG. No significant difference in complications was observed between the AG and WG. Of importance, adverse event rates did not differ between the two groups after adjusting by a propensity score analysis. In preoperative tests of blood coagulation, there were significant differences in the prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, FXa activity, and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1+2) levels between the AG and WG. CONCLUSION: The use of apixaban during the periprocedural period of AF ablation seemed as efficacious and safe as warfarin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagao et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=342). Apixaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Major bleeding complications. Uninterrupted periprocedural apixaban during atrial fibrillation ablation was associated with similar rates of major bleeding (1% vs 1%) and thromboembolic complications (0% vs 0.4%) as warfarin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: