PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 20, 2023EP Europace43 citationsOpen Access

Deep sedation protocol during atrial fibrillation ablation using a novel variable-loop biphasic pulsed field ablation catheter

View Full Paper
MGMassimo GrimaldiFQFederico QuadriniNCNicola Caporusso

Key Result

A deep sedation protocol during pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation was safe and effective, achieving a RASS score of -1 to -5 in 93% of patients with no procedural complications.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=29)

Structured PICO

Does a deep sedation protocol provide safe and effective sedation in patients undergoing pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
29 patients (mean age 55 years, 28% female) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulsed field ablation using a deep sedation protocol.
E
Exposure
Deep sedation protocol during pulsed field ablation using a variable-loop circular catheter.
O
Outcome
Safety and effectiveness of the sedation protocol assessed by Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Patient State Index (PSI), and Likert Scale Questionnaire (LSQ).patient reported

A deep sedation protocol is a safe and feasible alternative to general anesthesia during pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel, largely nonthermal ablative modality that, by virtue of its putative preferential action on myocardial tissue through the process of irreversible electroporation (IRE), may replace conventional thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). The recent inspIRE study confirmed safety and effectiveness of a fully integrated biphasic PFA system with a variable loop circular catheter for the treatment of paroxysmal AF. The majority of PFA procedures were performed using general anesthesia. However, due to the risks of general anesthesia we report the data regarding our sedation protocol used during inspIRE study. METHODS: A total of 29 patients (mean age 55±9 years; 72% male) were enrolled as part of this analysis within the inspIRE trial. The sedation protocol is reported in the manuscript. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Patient State Index were collected during sedation. Each patient was monitored using the Masimo Sedline. At the end of ablation, the Likert Scale Questionnaire (LSQ) was used to assess the patients' satisfaction with intraoperative analgesia-sedation. RESULTS: No procedural complications were documented. Sufficient oxygen saturation was maintained in all patients during procedure. Non-invasive ventilation or tracheal intubation were not required for any patient. The RAAS score between -1 to -5 was obtained in 27 patients (93%) while the value 0 was obtained in 2 patients (7%). The VAS score between 0 to 2 was obtained in 24 patients (83%); the VAS score 3 in 3 patients (10%) and the VAS score 4 in 2 patients (7%). The PSI score <50 was achieved in 16 patients (55%) while the PSI between 50 and 70 was achieved in 9 patients (31%). Positive answers to LSQ were obtained in most patients. CONCLUSION: During PFA ablation procedures with the variable-loop circular catheter and its accompanying biphasic pulse, our deep sedation protocol is a valid alternative to general anesthesia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Grimaldi et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=29). Deep sedation protocol was evaluated on Sedation efficacy (RASS score -1 to -5). A deep sedation protocol during pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation was safe and effective, achieving a RASS score of -1 to -5 in 93% of patients with no procedural complications.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6c30d43e46b6df0af34cb6https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad222
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper