PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1998Journal of Hypertension32 citations

Shear stress abnormalities contribute to endothelial dysfunction in hypertension but not in type II diabetes

View Full Paper
YKYasser KhderSBSerge BriançonRPRachel Petermann

Structured PICO

Does the contribution of shear stress to endothelial dysfunction differ between patients with hypertension and type II diabetes?

P
Population
48 subjects, comprising 16 untreated patients with high blood pressure, 15 type II normotensive diabetic patients, and 17 healthy controls.
C
Comparator
Healthy controls
O
Outcome
Radial artery diameter at baseline, after ischemic vasodilation, and after nitroglycerin vasodilation, as well as wall shear stresssurrogate

Endothelial dysfunction in hypertension appears to be primarily driven by a chronic decrease in shear stress, whereas in type II diabetes it is driven by intrinsic endothelial cell dysfunction independent of shear stress.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relative contribution of the various hemodynamic and metabolic mechanisms leading to endothelial dysfunction may be different in specific vascular diseases. Since shear stress is one of the main mechanical stimuli of endothelial cells, the aim of this study was to investigate its contribution to endothelial dysfunction in two distinct vascular diseases, hypertension and type II diabetes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We measured the radial artery diameter at baseline, after ischemic vasodilation and after nitroglycerin vasodilation in 16 untreated patients with high blood pressure, in 15 type II normotensive diabetic patients and in 17 healthy controls. Wall shear stress was evaluated by simultaneous measurements of whole blood viscosity and blood flow velocity. RESULTS: In diabetic patients, whole blood viscosity was significantly higher whereas wall shear stress was similar compared to controls. In hypertensive patients, whole blood viscosity was higher and wall shear stress was lower than in controls. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was impaired in both hypertensive and diabetic patients (P < 0.01) after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index and postnitroglycerin vasodilation. When adjustments were made for maximal systolic shear stress, endothelium-dependent vasodilation remained lower in the diabetic patients (P < 0.01), but not in those with high blood pressure compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: In hypertension, endothelium-dependent vasodilation is mainly due to a chronic decrease in shear stress (the most important physiological stimulus of the endothelial cells) with no major intrinsic endothelial cell dysfunction. In contrast, in diabetics, the lower endothelium-dependent vasodilation was not the result of an altered shear stress.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khder et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a708fe935aa2c282ce1e1a7https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-199816110-00008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Elevated blood viscosity in patients with borderline essential hypertension.1983 · 114 citations
  2. 2Noninvasive Detection of Functional Alterations of the Arterial Wall in IDDM Patients With and Without Microalbuminuria1995 · 111 citations
  3. 3Rheological determinants of blood pressure in a Scottish adult population1992 · 66 citations
  4. 4Arterial Blood Pressure1991 · 40 citations
  5. 5Arterial blood pressure. Correlation with erythrocyte count, hematocrit, and hemoglobin concentration.1991 · 89 citations