PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1999Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry70 citationsOpen Access

Prevalence and frequency of microembolic signals in 105 patients with extracranial carotid artery occlusive disease

View Full Paper
DDDirk W. DrosteRDRalf DittrichVKVendel Kemény

Structured PICO

Are microembolic signals more frequent in patients with echolucent carotid plaques, symptomatic disease, or higher degrees of stenosis?

P
Population
105 patients with extracranial carotid artery stenosis from 20%-99% or occlusion (64 symptomatic, 41 asymptomatic)
I
Intervention
Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (1 hour recording from the middle cerebral artery) and duplex ultrasound of the carotid arteries
C
Comparator
Comparison between symptomatic vs asymptomatic patients, varying degrees of stenosis, and plaque echolucency
O
Outcome
Prevalence and number of microembolic signals (MES)surrogate

Microembolic signals detected by transcranial Doppler are associated with symptomatic status and severity of carotid stenosis, but not plaque echolucency, suggesting their potential as a surrogate marker for stroke risk.

Abstract

Besides the established factors "presence of symptoms" and "degree of stenosis", plaque echolucency is considered to be associated with increased risk of stroke in patients with carotid artery disease. An evaluation was carried out as to whether the prevalence and number of microembolic signals (MES) detected by transcranial Doppler ultrasound were higher in patients with echolucent carotid plaques. One hundred and five patients with carotid artery stenosis from 20%-99% or occlusion underwent clinical investigations, duplex ultrasound of the carotid arteries, and a 1 hour recording from the middle cerebral artery downstream to the carotid artery pathology using the four gate technique. The presence of MES was more frequent and the number greater in symptomatic patients (21 out of 64 patients (33%); mean number of MES in all 64 patients 3.1) than in asymptomatic patients (four out of 41 patients (10%); mean number of MES in all 41 patients 0.3) (p=0.007, and p=0.006, respectively). Echogenicity of the lesions did not affect either number or presence of MES. Positivity for MES and the number of MES increased with increasing degree of stenosis (both p=0.002). Four out of 12 patients with carotid artery occlusion showed MES. No MES could be detected in carotid artery stenosis below 80%. There was a decline in positivity of MES and of the number of MES with the time after the ischaemic event. After 80 days or more after the index event, only one patient showed MES. In conclusion, increasing degree of stenosis and presence of symptoms similarly affect macroembolic and microembolic risk. Thus MES may be a surrogate parameter for risk of stroke. The presence of MES in a few asymptomatic patients suggests that clinically silent circulating microemboli may give additional information on the pending embolic potential of carotid artery stenoses. Echolucency of the plaque was not related to an increased number of MES.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Droste et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a712abeb27f15817827a7f7https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.67.4.525
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cerebral microembolism in symptomatic and asymptomatic high‐grade internal carotid artery stenosis1994 · 196 citations
  2. 2Quantification of Atheromatous Stenosis in the Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery1995 · 218 citations
  3. 3The Importance of Carotid Artery Plaque Disruption and Hemorrhage1987 · 80 citations
  4. 4Carotid plaque characteristics and presenting symptom1997 · 86 citations
  5. 5Ultrasonographic and Histologic Characteristics of Symptom-Free and Symptomatic Carotid Plaque1996 · 2 citations