PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2010Journal of Investigative Medicine25 citations

Both Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Soluble Flt-1 are Increased in Type 2 Diabetes but not in Impaired Fasting Glucose

View Full Paper
DNDebashis NandyDMDebabrata MukhopadhyayABAnanda Basu

Structured PICO

Are plasma concentrations of VEGF and sFlt-1 altered in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired fasting glucose compared to nondiabetic subjects?

P
Population
34 subjects including 11 nondiabetic (ND), 15 with impaired fasting glucose (IFG), and 8 with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM)
O
Outcome
Fasting plasma concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and soluble Flt-1 (sFlt-1)surrogate

Type 2 diabetes, but not impaired fasting glucose, is associated with elevated plasma levels of VEGF and its regulatory molecule sFlt-1, suggesting attenuated VEGF action on vascular remodeling.

Abstract

Objective Inadequate vascular remodeling is contributory to increased cardiovascular events in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its regulatory molecule soluble Flt-1(sFlt-1) play important roles in atherogenesis. Research Design We measured fasting plasma concentrations of VEGF and sFlt-1 in 11 nondiabetic (ND) (aged 46.1 ± 2.1 years; body mass index BMI, 26.1 ± 0.9 kg/m 2 ; glucose, 5.0 ± 0.1 mM), 15 IFG (aged 52.9 ± 1.8 years; BMI, 32.7 ± 1.3 kg/m 2 ; glucose, 6.4 ± 0.1 mM), and 8 DM (aged 55.8 ± 3.2 years; BMI, 30.0 ± 1.0 kg/m 2 ; glucose, 9.3 ± 0.5 mM) subjects. Results Plasma VEGF (42.1 ± 4.0 vs 24.2 ± 0.9 vs 29.4 ± 3.8 pg/mL, respectively) and sFlt-1 (119.4 ± 4.9 vs 58.9 ± 3.2 vs 56.7 ± 1.2 pg/mL, respectively) concentrations were higher ( P < 0.04) in DM than IFG and ND subjects. Whereas VEGF concentrations were significantly lower ( P < 0.05) in IFG than in ND subjects, sFlt-1 concentrations did not differ between the IFG and ND subjects. Conclusions Although plasma VEGF concentrations were higher (35%) in DM than in ND subjects, VEGF action on vascular remodeling was likely attenuated by higher sFlt-1 concentrations in DM. In contrast, IFG subjects did not have major perturbations in either VEGF or sFlt-1 levels. Further studies defining the roles of these mediators in DM and IFG are necessary to extend these observations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nandy et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7257895671bbf00bc30e25https://doi.org/10.2310/jim.0b013e3181e96203
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper