Why the study?
Are plasma concentrations of VEGF and sFlt-1 altered in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired fasting glucose compared to nondiabetic subjects?
Are plasma concentrations of VEGF and sFlt-1 altered in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired fasting glucose compared to nondiabetic subjects?
Type 2 diabetes, but not impaired fasting glucose, is associated with elevated plasma levels of VEGF and its regulatory molecule sFlt-1, suggesting attenuated VEGF action on vascular remodeling.
Elevated VEGF/sFlt-1 in diabetes should not yet change practice; leaves open prognostic or therapeutic roles in vascular remodeling.
Objective Inadequate vascular remodeling is contributory to increased cardiovascular events in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its regulatory molecule soluble Flt-1(sFlt-1) play important roles in atherogenesis. Research Design We measured fasting plasma concentrations of VEGF and sFlt-1 in 11 nondiabetic (ND) (aged 46.1 ± 2.1 years; body mass index [BMI], 26.1 ± 0.9 kg/m 2 ; glucose, 5.0 ± 0.1 mM), 15 IFG (aged 52.9 ± 1.8 years; BMI, 32.7 ± 1.3 kg/m 2 ; glucose, 6.4 ± 0.1 mM), and 8 DM (aged 55.8 ± 3.2 years; BMI, 30.0 ± 1.0 kg/m 2 ; glucose, 9.3 ± 0.5 mM) subjects. Results Plasma VEGF (42.1 ± 4.0 vs 24.2 ± 0.9 vs 29.4 ± 3.8 pg/mL, respectively) and sFlt-1 (119.4 ± 4.9 vs 58.9 ± 3.2 vs 56.7 ± 1.2 pg/mL, respectively) concentrations were higher ( P < 0.04) in DM than IFG and ND subjects. Whereas VEGF concentrations were significantly lower ( P < 0.05) in IFG than in ND subjects, sFlt-1 concentrations did not differ between the IFG and ND subjects. Conclusions Although plasma VEGF concentrations were higher (35%) in DM than in ND subjects, VEGF action on vascular remodeling was likely attenuated by higher sFlt-1 concentrations in DM. In contrast, IFG subjects did not have major perturbations in either VEGF or sFlt-1 levels. Further studies defining the roles of these mediators in DM and IFG are necessary to extend these observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nandy et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: