PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 10, 2000Circulation170 citationsOpen Access

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Activators Downregulate Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

View Full Paper
KTKotaro TakedaTIToshihiro IchikiTTTomotake Tokunou

Structured PICO

Do PPARgamma activators downregulate Angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells?

P
Population
Cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs)
I
Intervention
PPARgamma activators (troglitazone and 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J(2))
O
Outcome
Expression of Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1-R) mRNA and protein levelssurrogate

PPARgamma activators downregulate AT1-R expression in vascular smooth muscle cells, providing a potential molecular mechanism for their inhibition of neointimal formation after vascular injury.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) activators, such as troglitazone (Tro), not only improve insulin resistance but also suppress the neointimal formation after balloon injury. However, the precise mechanisms have not been determined. Angiotensin II (Ang II) plays crucial roles in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, hypertension, and neointimal formation after angioplasty. We examined the effect of PPARgamma activators on the expression of Ang II type 1 receptor (AT(1)-R) in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). METHODS AND RESULTS: AT(1)-R mRNA and AT(1)-R protein levels were determined by Northern blot analysis and radioligand binding assay, respectively. Natural PPARgamma ligand 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J(2), as well as Tro, reduced the AT(1)-R mRNA expression and the AT(1)-R protein level. The PPARgamma activators also reduced the calcium response of VSMCs to Ang II. PPARgamma activators suppressed the AT(1)-R promoter activity measured by luciferase assay but did not affect the AT(1)-R mRNA stability, suggesting that the suppression occurs at the transcriptional level. CONCLUSIONS: PPARgamma activators reduced the AT(1)-R expression and calcium response to Ang II in VSMCs. Downregulation of AT(1)-R may contribute to the inhibition of neointimal formation by PPARgamma activators.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Takeda et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a72c29931a3df82432a4160https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.15.1834
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Insulin Induces Upregulation of Vascular AT1Receptor Gene Expression by Posttranscriptional Mechanisms1998 · 228 citations
  2. 2Vascular smooth muscle cell hypertrophy vs. hyperplasia. Autocrine transforming growth factor-beta 1 expression determines growth response to angiotensin II.1992 · 645 citations
  3. 3Pioglitazone attenuates hypertension and inhibits growth of renal arteriolar smooth muscle in rats1993 · 119 citations
  4. 4Angiotensin Receptors and Their Antagonists1996 · 563 citations
  5. 5Role of angiotensin II in injury-induced neointima formation in rats.1991 · 116 citations