PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2009Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnętrznej16 citationsOpen Access

Switching from acenocoumarol to warfarin in patients with unstable anticoagulation and its effect on anticoagulation control

AUAnetta UndasMCMariola Cieśla‐DulMŻMarek Żółciński

Key Result

Switching from acenocoumarol to warfarin in patients with unstable anticoagulation significantly increased the percentage of time within the target INR range from 40.2% to 60.4%.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=136)

Blinding

Open-label

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does switching from acenocoumarol to warfarin improve anticoagulation control in patients with unstable anticoagulation?

P
Population
136 patients aged 75 years or younger on chronic oral anticoagulation with acenocoumarol, including 68 with unstable control who were switched to warfarin, followed for 6 months.
I
Intervention
Switching from acenocoumarol to warfarin (mean dose 7.61 mg/day) for 6 months.
C
Comparator
Continued acenocoumarol (mean dose 4.06 mg/day) in the matched stable anticoagulation reference group.
O
Outcome
Percentage time within the target INR range at 6 months follow-up.surrogate

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 60.4% vs 40.2%

p-value: p=<0.05

Limitations

  • Small study population and short follow-up period
  • INRs were determined in several local laboratories using likely different reagents
  • Lack of data on specific external laboratory quality control
  • Dietary vitamin K intake was not assessed
  • Potential impact of genetic factors (e.g., cytochrome P450 2C9 variants) was not evaluated
  • INRs determined in several local laboratories using likely different reagents without specific external laboratory quality control data
  • Potential impact of genetic factors (e.g., CYP2C9 variants) was not evaluated

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Unstable oral anticoagulation increases the risk of thrombotic events and bleedings. Acenocoumarol use has been reported to be associated with two-fold higher risk for instability of anticoagulation control compared to warfarin administration. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of introducing warfarin on anticoagulation control in patients with a variable response to acenocoumarol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight subjects treated with acenocoumarol for 5 months or more and displaying intraindividual variability of international normalized ratio (INR) results were switched to warfarin. Unstable anticoagulation was defined as a failure to achieve a target INR within the preceding 3 months, i.e. > or = 50% of 8 or more INR values below 2 or above 3.5. Patients with stable anticoagulation (<20% of out-of-range INRs), matched for age, gender, and anticoagulation indications, served as a reference group. RESULTS: Patients with unstable anticoagulation on acenocoumarol had higher body mass index (p<0.01) and serum C-reactive protein levels (p<0.01) compared to stable counterparts. The transition factor between acenocoumarol and warfarin was 1.8 (95% CI 1.69-1.96). The percentage time within the target INR range in patients with unstable anticoagulation was 40.2% at baseline and increased to 60.4% following 6 months on warfarin therapy (p<0.05). The number of subjects with <20% of out-of-range INRs among individuals switched from acenocoumarol to warfarin was 22 (32.4%) vs. 63 (92.6%) in patients on stable anticoagulation after 6 months of follow-up (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Switching acenocoumarol to warfarin in patients with unstable anticoagulation can improve anticoagulation control.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Undas et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Unstable oral anticoagulation (n=136). Warfarin vs. Baseline acenocoumarol (before-after comparison) was evaluated on Percentage time within the target INR range (p=<0.05). Switching from acenocoumarol to warfarin in patients with unstable anticoagulation significantly increased the percentage of time within the target INR range from 40.2% to 60.4%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a75c4bd3c1d3f13c2dd9b80https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.709
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The value of education and self‐monitoring in the management of warfarin therapy in older patients with unstable control of anticoagulation2004 · 176 citations
  2. 2Thrombotic Events during Oral Anticoagulant Treatment: Results of the Inception-cohort, Prospective, Collaborative ISCOAT Study1997 · 88 citations
  3. 3Aging and the Anticoagulant Response to Warfarin Therapy1992 · 232 citations
  4. 4Risks factors for highly unstable response to oral anticoagulation: a case‐control study2005 · 97 citations
  5. 5Warfarin or Acenocoumarol: Which Is better in the Management of Oral Anticoagulants?1998 · 81 citations