PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 28, 2018International Journal of Cardiology25 citationsOpen Access

Differential multivariable risk prediction of appropriate shock versus competing mortality - A prospective cohort study to estimate benefits from ICD therapy

LBLeonard BergauRWRik WillemsDSDavid J. Sprenkeler

Key Result

A multivariable shock score stratified ICD patients into a high annual risk of appropriate shocks (10% per year in the upper quintile) versus a low risk (1.8% per year in the lower two quintiles).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=635)

Structured PICO

Does a multivariable diagnostic strategy predict appropriate shock versus competing mortality in ICD patients?

P
Population
635 patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (mean age 63, 81% male, mean LVEF 40%) followed for a mean of 4.3 years.
E
Exposure
Multivariable risk prediction strategy including history, LVEF, EP study, T-wave alternans testing, 24-h Holter, NT-proBNP, and eGFR
O
Outcome
All-cause mortality and first appropriate ICD shockhard clinical

A multivariable diagnostic strategy, particularly including EP stimulation, effectively differentiates the risk of appropriate ICD shocks from competing mortality in ICD patients.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We prospectively investigated combinations of risk stratifiers including multiple EP diagnostics in a cohort study of ICD patients. METHODS: For 672 enrolled patients, we collected history, LVEF, EP study and T-wave alternans testing, 24-h Holter, NT-proBNP, and the eGFR. All-cause mortality and first appropriate ICD shock were predefined endpoints. RESULTS: The 635 patients included in the final analyses were 63 ± 13 years old, 81% were male, LVEF averaged 40 ± 14%, 20% were inducible at EP study, 63% had a primary prophylactic ICD. During follow-up over 4.3 ± 1.5 years, 108 patients died (4.0% per year), and appropriate shock therapy occurred in n = 96 (3.9% per year). In multivariate regression, age (p < 0.001), LVEF (p < 0.001), NYHA functional class (p = 0.007), eGFR (p = 0.024), a history of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.011), and NT-pro-BNP (p = 0.002) were predictors of mortality. LVEF (p = 0.002), inducibility at EP study (p = 0.007), and secondary prophylaxis (p = 0.002) were identified as independent predictors of appropriate shocks. A high annualized risk of shocks of about 10% per year was prevalent in the upper quintile of the shock score. In contrast, a low annual risk of shocks (1.8% per year) was found in the lower two quintiles of the shock score. The lower two quintiles of the mortality score featured an annual mortality <0.6%. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective ICD patient cohort, a very good approximation of mortality versus arrhythmic risk was possible using a multivariable diagnostic strategy. EP stimulation is the best test to assess risk of arrhythmias resulting in ICD shocks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bergau et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in ICD patients (n=635). Multivariable risk prediction was evaluated on All-cause mortality and first appropriate ICD shock. A multivariable shock score stratified ICD patients into a high annual risk of appropriate shocks (10% per year in the upper quintile) versus a low risk (1.8% per year in the lower two quintiles).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a78db48b93e9676e101f49ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.103
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper