PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1994American Journal of Hypertension27 citations

Multicenter Assessment of the QuietTrak Ambulatory Blood Pressure Recorder According to the 1992 AAMI Guidelines

View Full Paper
WWWilliam B. WhiteWSWendy SusserGJGary D. James

Structured PICO

Does the QuietTrak ambulatory blood pressure recorder provide accurate BP measurements compared to clinician auscultation according to 1992 AAMI guidelines?

P
Population
122 subjects for simultaneous BP measurements and 46 subjects for 24-h blood pressure recordings across three clinic sites
I
Intervention
QuietTrak ambulatory blood pressure recorder (portable, noninvasive, auscultatory measuring system)
C
Comparator
Simultaneous, same arm BP measurements by two skilled clinicians per site using a teaching stethoscope and mercury column
O
Outcome
Accuracy and clinical performance of the device (mean difference between observer average and device)surrogate

The QuietTrak ambulatory blood pressure recorder demonstrates acceptable accuracy and performance for clinical and research use according to the 1992 AAMI guidelines.

Abstract

To clinically evaluate the QuietTrak ambulatory blood pressure (BP) recorder (Tycos-Welch-Allyn, Arden, NC), we assessed the device according to the performance criteria set out by the 1992 Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) guidelines. The QuietTrak is a portable, noninvasive recorder that uses an auscultatory measuring system. As recommended in the 1992 AAMI guidelines, a large, heterogeneous population was recruited for the study using three clinic sites to assess accuracy and clinical performance. In addition, observer agreement and the effects of age, arm circumference, heart rate, posture, and blood pressure level on the observer-device differences were analyzed. There were 1098 simultaneous, same arm BP measurements performed in 122 subjects by the QuietTrak recorder versus two skilled clinicians per site using a teaching stethoscope and 24-h blood pressure recordings performed in 46 subjects to assess reliability of the monitor. The differences in observers for all sites were 0.7/−0.5 ± 3.8/3.5 mm Hg with 89% of the BPs within 5 mm Hg. The mean difference between observer average and the device (all positions) was 0.3/−1.5 ± 5.0/7.5 mm Hg. The agreement between the QuietTrak and mercury column determinations was within 10 mm Hg for 92 to 94% of systolic readings and 91 to 93% of diastolic readings, depending on the posture. The limits of agreement (2 standard deviations about the mean difference) between observers and the device for systolic BP tended to be lower for the sitting position (−11 to 10 mm Hg) compared to supine (−14 to 13 mm Hg) and standing (−14 to 14 mm Hg) positions. Twenty-four-hour blood pressure monitoring demonstrated a total error code rate of 9% with cuff disconnection, arm movement, and out-of-range BP comprising most errors. These data demonstrate an acceptable level of accuracy and performance of the Tycos-Welch-Allyn QuietTrak ambulatory BP recorder for use in clinical practice and research according to the 1992 AAMI recommendations. Am J Hypertens 1994;7:509-514

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

White et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7a8ff814b028facf0e6e0dhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/7.6.509
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Factors confounding assessment of ambulatory blood pressure monitors, studied during formal evaluation of the tycos Quiet-Trak1997 · 17 citations
  2. 2Accutracker II (version 30/23) ambulatory blood pressure monitor1993 · 42 citations
  3. 3A Multicenter Evaluation of the A&D TM-2420 Ambulatory Blood Pressure Recorde1991 · 51 citations
  4. 4Clinical evaluation of the Accutracker II ambulatory blood pressure monitor: assessment of performance in two countries and comparison with sphygmomanometry and intra-arterial blood pressure at rest and during exercise1989 · 77 citations
  5. 5THE ACCURACY AND PRECISION OF THE ACCUTRACKER AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR1990 · 34 citations