Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
PURPOSE: To examine how fine a model resolution is necessary for calculation of specific energy absorption rate (SAR) for the human head in regions as small as 1 g. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here we perform a simple study comparing the maximum SAR averaged over any 1 cm(3) and SAR averaged over the entire head for several models of the same human head within the same radiofrequency coil, but with spatial resolutions varying from 8-100 Yee cells per cm(3). RESULTS: Over the range of model resolutions from 8-100 Yee cells per cm(3), there is only a 16% variation in maximum SAR in any 1 cm(3) of tissue in the head, and only a 7% variation in SAR averaged over the entire head. CONCLUSION: While it is always desirable to perform SAR calculations with the greatest possible accuracy, in calculations of the maximum SAR levels in any 1 cm(3) of tissue, spatial resolutions greater than 5 mm may not yield notably different results than those with a spatial resolution of 5 mm.
Collins et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: