PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 1975New England Journal of Medicine405 citations

The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and Judgments

View Full Paper

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Interpreting Diagnostic ProceduresElectrocardiograph (Table 3)Efforts are under way to minimize sources of observer disagreement in electrocardiographic interpretation by use of codes, averaging of readings, computer analysis, and other methods.35 36 37 Even with completely reliable computerized reading, the diagnostic implications of electrocardiographic changes depend on the patient's age, sex, and clinical situation. In the following studies, the clinical information available to the readers varied.Gorman and his associates30 compared two independent interpretations of an unselected series of 561 electrocardiograms of adult inpatients. The tracings were read first by one of three electrocardiographers and then by one . . .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A 1975 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7d22262f2f9d79738b2186https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm197510022931405
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Analysis of emergency department interpretation of electrocardiograms.1994 · 42 citations
  2. 2Evaluation of ECG Interpretation Results Obtained by Computer and Cardiologists1990 · 61 citations
  3. 3Clinical information: an indispensable component of ECG interpretation1991
  4. 4A New Method to Assess the Difficulty of a Medical Diagnosis: Application to Electrocardiographic Interpretation1993 · 3 citations
  5. 5Clinical Information: An Indispensable Component of ECG Interpretation-Reply1991 · 2 citations