Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Observer disagreement in ECG interpretation warrants clinical caution; leaves open optimal standardization methods for research.
Interpreting Diagnostic ProceduresElectrocardiograph (Table 3)Efforts are under way to minimize sources of observer disagreement in electrocardiographic interpretation by use of codes, averaging of readings, computer analysis, and other methods.35 36 37 Even with completely reliable computerized reading, the diagnostic implications of electrocardiographic changes depend on the patient's age, sex, and clinical situation. In the following studies, the clinical information available to the readers varied.Gorman and his associates30 compared two independent interpretations of an unselected series of 561 electrocardiograms of adult inpatients. The tracings were read first by one of three electrocardiographers and then by one . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1975 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: