PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1994Postgraduate Medical Journal41 citationsOpen Access

Do carotid bruits predict disease of the internal carotid arteries?

KDK N DaviesPHP Humphrey

Structured PICO

Does the presence of a carotid bruit predict moderate or severe internal carotid artery stenosis in patients referred to a cerebrovascular clinic?

P
Population
331 consecutive patients referred to a specialist cerebrovascular clinic
I
Intervention
Presence of a carotid bruit mentioned by the referring practitioner
C
Comparator
Absence of a carotid bruit
O
Outcome
Presence of moderate (30-69%) or severe (70-99%) stenosis of the internal carotid arteries assessed by Doppler duplex scanningsurrogate

A carotid bruit is a poor predictor of clinically significant carotid artery stenosis, indicating that all patients with suspected carotid territory ischemia should undergo imaging regardless of auscultation findings.

Abstract

A carotid bruit is often thought of as a reliable sign of extracranial carotid artery disease. In addition finding a bruit may precipitate a referral to hospital. Carotid endarterectomy has now been shown to be beneficial in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia and 70-99% stenosis of the relevant carotid artery, therefore it is important that such patients are detected and referred. In this study of 331 consecutive patients referred to a specialist cerebrovascular clinic we examined the practical value of a carotid bruit mentioned by the referring practitioner. All patients underwent clinical assessment, evaluation of risk factors and Doppler duplex scanning of the carotid arteries. A bruit was stated in the referral letter of 110 (33%) patients. Moderate (30-69%) or severe (70-99%) stenosis was present in 37% of patients with, and 17% of those without a carotid bruit (P < 0.001). We found a carotid bruit was a poor predictor of such disease (positive predictive value, 37%). The false negative rate for severe disease was 43%. Normal carotid arteries were found in 32% of patients with a bruit. We therefore suggest that all patients with suspected carotid territory ischaemia should be referred for assessment whether there is a bruit present or not.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Davies et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7db4b49c5f03601cb86ecahttps://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.70.824.433
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prevalence of Atherosclerotic Lesions at the Carotid Bifurcation in Patients with Asymptomatic Bruits: An Echo-Doppler (Duplex) Study1985 · 8 citations
  2. 2Amaurosis fugax and carotid artery disease: indications for angiography.1977 · 34 citations
  3. 3Noninvasive Evaluation of the Carotid Bruit1980 · 15 citations
  4. 4Predictive Value of Carotid Bruit for Carotid Atherosclerosis1989 · 42 citations
  5. 5Auscultation of cervical and ocular bruits in extracranial carotid occlusive disease: a clinical and angiographic study.1983 · 35 citations