PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 2016Physiological Reports30 citationsOpen Access

Altered thermoregulatory responses in heart failure patients exercising in the heat

View Full Paper
BBBryce N. BalmainOJOllie JaySSSurendran Sabapathy

Key Result

During exercise in the heat, heart failure patients had a lower elevation in cutaneous vascular conductance (1.4 vs 3.0 au/mmHg, P<0.05) and sweat rate (0.36 vs 0.81 L/h, P=0.02) than controls.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=18)

Structured PICO

Do heart failure patients have altered thermoregulatory responses during exercise in the heat compared to controls?

P
Population
18 participants, comprising 10 patients with NYHA class I-II heart failure and 8 controls, assessed during 1 hour of exercise in the heat.
E
Exposure
1 hour of exercise at 60% of maximal oxygen uptake in the heat
C
Comparator
Controls undergoing the same exercise protocol
O
Outcome
Thermoregulatory responses including core temperature, skin temperature, cutaneous vascular conductance, metabolic heat production, evaporative requirements for heat balance, and whole-body sweat ratesurrogate

Heart failure patients have an impaired ability to manage thermal loads during exercise in the heat due to reduced peripheral circulation and sweating.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 1.4% vs 3%

p-value: p=<0.05

Abstract

Abstract Heart failure ( HF ) patients appear to exhibit impaired thermoregulatory capacity during passive heating, as evidenced by diminished vascular conductance. Although some preliminary studies have described the thermoregulatory response to passive heating in HF , responses during exercise in the heat remain to be described. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare thermoregulatory responses in HF and controls ( CON ) during exercise in the heat. Ten HF ( NYHA classes I–II) and eight CON were included. Core temperature ( T c ), skin temperature ( T sk ), and cutaneous vascular conductance ( CVC ) were assessed at rest and during 1 h of exercise at 60% of maximal oxygen uptake. Metabolic heat production ( H prod ) and the evaporative requirements for heat balance ( E req ) were also calculated. Whole‐body sweat rate was determined from pre–post nude body mass corrected for fluid intake. While H prod ( HF : 3.9 ± 0.9; CON : 6.4 ± 1.5 W/kg) and E req ( HF : 3.3 ± 0.9; CON : 5.6 ± 1.4 W/kg) were lower ( P < 0.01) for HF compared to CON , both groups demonstrated a similar rise in T c ( HF : 0.9 ± 0.4; CON : 1.0 ± 0.3°C). Despite this similar rise in T c , T sk ( HF : 1.6 ± 0.7; CON : 2.7 ± 1.2°C), and the elevation in CVC ( HF : 1.4 ± 1.0; CON : 3.0 ± 1.2 au/mmHg) was lower ( P < 0.05) in HF compared to CON . Additionally, whole‐body sweat rate ( HF : 0.36 ± 0.15; CON : 0.81 ± 0.39 L/h) was lower ( P = 0.02) in HF compared to CON . Patients with HF appear to be limited in their ability to manage a thermal load and distribute heat content to the body surface (i.e., skin), secondary to impaired circulation to the periphery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Balmain et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=18). Heart failure vs. Controls was evaluated on Elevation in cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) (p=<0.05). During exercise in the heat, heart failure patients had a lower elevation in cutaneous vascular conductance (1.4 vs 3.0 au/mmHg, P<0.05) and sweat rate (0.36 vs 0.81 L/h, P=0.02) than controls.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7dceb1968fa26fcacb5107https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13022
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper