Why the study?
Do heart failure patients have altered thermoregulatory responses during exercise in the heat compared to controls?
Observational (n=18)
Do heart failure patients have altered thermoregulatory responses during exercise in the heat compared to controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.4% vs 3%
p-value: p=<0.05
Heart failure patients have an impaired ability to manage thermal loads during exercise in the heat due to reduced peripheral circulation and sweating.
May warrant caution during heat exercise in heart failure; hypothesis-generating for thermoregulatory mechanisms and interventions.
Heart failure ( HF ) patients appear to exhibit impaired thermoregulatory capacity during passive heating, as evidenced by diminished vascular conductance. Although some preliminary studies have described the thermoregulatory response to passive heating in HF , responses during exercise in the heat remain to be described. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare thermoregulatory responses in HF and controls ( CON ) during exercise in the heat. Ten HF ( NYHA classes I–II) and eight CON were included. Core temperature ( T c ), skin temperature ( T sk ), and cutaneous vascular conductance ( CVC ) were assessed at rest and during 1 h of exercise at 60% of maximal oxygen uptake. Metabolic heat production ( H prod ) and the evaporative requirements for heat balance ( E req ) were also calculated. Whole‐body sweat rate was determined from pre–post nude body mass corrected for fluid intake. While H prod ( HF : 3.9 ± 0.9; CON : 6.4 ± 1.5 W/kg) and E req ( HF : 3.3 ± 0.9; CON : 5.6 ± 1.4 W/kg) were lower ( P < 0.01) for HF compared to CON , both groups demonstrated a similar rise in T c ( HF : 0.9 ± 0.4; CON : 1.0 ± 0.3°C). Despite this similar rise in T c , T sk ( HF : 1.6 ± 0.7; CON : 2.7 ± 1.2°C), and the elevation in CVC ( HF : 1.4 ± 1.0; CON : 3.0 ± 1.2 au/mmHg) was lower ( P < 0.05) in HF compared to CON . Additionally, whole‐body sweat rate ( HF : 0.36 ± 0.15; CON : 0.81 ± 0.39 L/h) was lower ( P = 0.02) in HF compared to CON . Patients with HF appear to be limited in their ability to manage a thermal load and distribute heat content to the body surface (i.e., skin), secondary to impaired circulation to the periphery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balmain et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=18). Heart failure vs. Controls was evaluated on Elevation in cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) (p=<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: