PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 20, 1996Applied Optics129 citations

Discussion of two quadrature methods of evaluating beam-shape coefficients in generalized Lorenz–Mie theory

View Full Paper
GGG. GouesbetCLChristophe LetellierKRKuan Fang Ren

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A comparison between two quadrature methods of evaluating beam-shape coefficients in generalized Lorenz-Mie theory, in the case of incident Gaussian beams, is carried out. It is shown that, when the electromagnetic description of the Gaussian beams does not perfectly satisfy Maxwell's equations, both quadrature methods are basically flawed. These flaws do not prevent an accurate evaluation of beam-shape coefficients when their nature is correctly identified, because they produce artifacts that can easily be identified and removed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gouesbet et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8491bb4d02f4f0268d8c64https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.35.001537
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rigorous justification of the localized approximation to the beam-shape coefficients in generalized Lorenz–Mie theory II Off-axis beams1994 · 187 citations
  2. 2Rigorous justification of the localized approximation to the beam-shape coefficients in generalized Lorenz–Mie theory I On-axis beams1994 · 243 citations
  3. 3Partial-wave representations of laser beams for use in light-scattering calculations1995 · 113 citations
  4. 4Localized interpretation to compute all the coefficients gnm in the generalized Lorenz–Mie theory1990 · 191 citations
  5. 5Expressions to compute the coefficients g m n in the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory using finite series1988 · 128 citations