PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2008Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research0 citations

Inter‐Regional Collaboration for Errors and Near Misses with Unfractionated Heparin

View Full Paper
ELElizabeth A LoeNPNirasha ParsotamABAnne F Blumgart

Structured PICO

P
Population
61 patients started on unfractionated heparin at three district health boards in Auckland
I
Intervention
Unfractionated heparin protocols
O
Outcome
Compliance with 6 criteria of prescribing and administration common to each hospital protocol

Compliance with unfractionated heparin protocols was low across three health boards, highlighting the need for systems changes to improve safety and effectiveness.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Unfractionated heparin is a high‐risk medication, as serious adverse events may result from errors of use. Different practices and protocols for unfractionated heparin are used at the three district health boards in Auckland. Concern about the inadequacies of heparin use prompted a collaborative evaluation of adherence to unfractionated heparin protocols and to aid the formulation of solutions for process improvement. Aim To evaluate the three district health boards' compliance with unfractionated heparin protocols, and to identify issues with prescribing and administration and the occurrence of adverse events. Method A retrospective audit of all patients started on unfractionated heparin at the three district health boards was undertaken from March to June 2005. An audit tool was developed to evaluate compliance with 6 criteria of prescribing and administration common to each hospital protocol and data were collected on indication and occurrence of adverse events. Results 61 patients were audited. 51% had a baseline activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) measured, 39% had an aPTT measured at 6 hours, 80% received a heparin loading dose (90% as per protocol), 85% received maintenance infusion dose and rate as per protocol and 35% had failed to reach target aPTT at 72 hours. None of the 6 criteria achieved 100% compliance. Conclusion Compliance with the specified protocols was low. Systems changes have been identified that can improve the safety and effectiveness of unfractionated heparin use.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Loe et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a916ca8388f32339cd2d04dhttps://doi.org/10.1002/j.2055-2335.2008.tb00840.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 16894 Improving intravenous heparin prescribing practice on a paediatric intensive care unit2024
  2. 2Heparin Monitoring and Patient Safety: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 3431 Patients at 140 Institutions2004 · 19 citations
  3. 3Evaluation of a Weight‐Based Heparin Dosing Protocol2005 · 3 citations
  4. 41701: EXPLORING THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF INTERDISCIPLINARY HEPARIN MANAGEMENT: A PILOT STUDY2026
  5. 5Optimizing Heparin Quality Assurance Utilizing Electronic Data Abstraction2024