PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 14, 2025CHEST Journal7 citationsOpen Access

Cardiovascular Events in COPD

JDJuan P. de‐TorresCCCiro CasanovaJZJorge Zagaceta

Key Result

High cardiovascular risk score (≥10%) combined with coronary artery calcium score (>3) significantly increased the risk of MACEs compared to low scores (HR 7.6; 95% CI 4.9-11.9; P<.001).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=529)

Structured PICO

Does a combination of cardiovascular risk score (CVRS) and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) improve risk assessment of MACEs in patients with COPD?

P
Population
529 mostly male patients with moderate COPD followed for a median of 98 months.
E
Exposure
Combination of cardiovascular risk score (CVRS) and coronary artery calcium score (CACS)
C
Comparator
CVRS alone, CACS alone, or low-risk baseline group (CVRS < 10% and CACS ≤ 3)
O
Outcome
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) over a median of 98 monthscomposite

Combining cardiovascular risk scores with coronary artery calcium scores significantly improves the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with COPD.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 7.6 (95% CI 4.9–11.9)

p-value: p=< .001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with COPD are at high risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) developing. Existing clinical tools for risk stratification in these patients have underperformed in predicting the outcomes. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does a combination of cardiovascular risk score (CVRS) and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) improve risk assessment of MACEs in patients with COPD? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an observational cohort of patients with COPD (n = 529). They underwent a chest CT scan, and clinical, functional, and laboratory data were recorded. The CACS and CVRS (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation SCORE 2, SCORE2-Older People OP, SCORE2-Diabetes, and Secondary Manifestations of Arterial Disease SMART risk scores) were calculated. Using a threshold of CVRS of ≥ 10% or CACS score of > 3, patients were divided into 4 groups-group I, CVRS 3; and group IV, CVRS ≥ 10% and CACS > 3-who were followed up for a median of 98 months. Regression analysis and Kaplan Meier curves were used to compare the risks among groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined the performance of CACS and CVRS and their combination to predict MACEs. RESULTS: Most patients were male (80%) with moderate COPD. Over time, 131 patients (24%) experienced a MACE. Compared with group I, the hazard ratios for MACEs were: group IV, 7.6 (95% CI, 4.9-11.9; P < .001); group III, 3.1 (95% CI, 1.8-8.5; P < .001); and group II, 2.6 (95% CI, 1.6-4.2; P < .001). The areas under the ROC curve for predicting MACEs were 0.72 (P < .01) for CACS plus CVRS compared with 0.69 for CVRS and 0.66 for CACS. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cardiovascular risk and coronary artery calcification scores were shown to provide a complementary role in MACE risk stratification in patients with COPD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

de‐Torres et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in COPD (n=529). High cardiovascular risk score (CVRS ≥ 10%) and coronary artery calcium score (CACS > 3) vs. Low cardiovascular risk score (CVRS < 10%) and coronary artery calcium score (CACS ≤ 3) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (HR 7.6, 95% CI 4.9-11.9, p=< .001). High cardiovascular risk score (≥10%) combined with coronary artery calcium score (>3) significantly increased the risk of MACEs compared to low scores (HR 7.6; 95% CI 4.9-11.9; P<.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa5215daffc7bfe5364ada3https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.09.133
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper