25 pubs · 4,266 cites · h-index 12
BACKGROUND: Fingolimod (FTY720), a sphingosine-1-phosphate-receptor modulator that prevents lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes, showed clinical efficacy and improvement on imaging in a phase 2 study involving patients with multiple sclerosis. METHODS: In this 12-month, double-blind, double-dummy study, we randomly assigned 1292 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who had a recent history of at least one relapse to receive either oral fingolimod at a daily dose of either 1.25 or 0.5 mg or intramuscular interferon beta-1a (an established therapy for multiple sclerosis) at a weekly dose of 30 microg. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. Key secondary end points were the number of new or enlarged lesions on T(2)-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans at 12 months and progression of disability that was sustained for at least 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 1153 patients (89%) completed the study. The annualized relapse rate was significantly lower in both groups receiving fingolimod--0.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.26) in the 1.25-mg group and 0.16 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.21) in the 0.5-mg group--than in the interferon group (0.33; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.42; P<0.001 for both comparisons). MRI findings supported the primary results. No significant differences were seen among the study groups with respect to progression of disability. Two fatal infections occurred in the group that received the 1.25-mg dose of fingolimod: disseminated primary varicella zoster and herpes simplex encephalitis. Other adverse events among patients receiving fingolimod were nonfatal herpesvirus infections, bradycardia and atrioventricular block, hypertension, macular edema, skin cancer, and elevated liver-enzyme levels. CONCLUSIONS: This trial showed the superior efficacy of oral fingolimod with respect to relapse rates and MRI outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis, as compared with intramuscular interferon beta-1a. Longer studies are needed to assess the safety and efficacy of treatment beyond 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00340834.)
In a 6-month, placebo-controlled trial, oral fingolimod (FTY720) 1.25 or 5.0 mg, once daily, significantly reduced MRI inflammatory activity and annualized relapse rate compared with placebo in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). The objectives were to monitor the 36-month, interim efficacy and safety results of the ongoing extension of this study. In the extension (months 7-36), placebo-treated patients were re-randomized to either dose of fingolimod; fingolimod-treated patients continued at the same dose. During months 15-24, all patients receiving fingolimod 5.0 mg switched to 1.25 mg. Of the 250 patients who entered the extension study, 173 (69%) continued to month 36. Most patients were free from gadolinium-enhanced lesions (88-89%) or new T2 lesions (70-78%) at month 36. Patients receiving continuous fingolimod treatment had sustained low annualized relapse rates of 0.20-0.21, and 68-73% remained relapse-free at month 36. Over 36 months, nasopharyngitis (34%), headache (30%), fatigue (19%) and influenza (18%) were the most commonly reported adverse events. Pulmonary function remained stable and blood pressure was stable after an initial increase (3-5 mmHg) during the first 6 months of fingolimod treatment; serious adverse events included infections and skin cancer. The low MRI and clinical disease activity at 6 months were maintained at 36 months with fingolimod, which was generally well tolerated by most patients. The efficacy and safety of oral fingolimod are being further evaluated in a large phase III MS study programme.
FTY720 is a novel immunomodulator investigated in de novo renal transplantation and other therapeutic areas including multiple sclerosis. This 1-year multicenter, randomized, phase III study in 668 de novo renal transplant patients compared FTY720 2.5 mg plus full-dose cyclosporine (FDC) or FTY720 5.0 mg plus reduced-dose cyclosporine (RDC), with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus FDC. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite incidence of first treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or premature study discontinuation at month 12. Primary efficacy with FTY720 2.5 mg and MMF (32.4% and 30.2%; p = NS), plus mortality and BPAR incidence, were comparable. Patients receiving FTY720 5.0 mg plus RDC were discontinued from treatment due to increased risk of acute rejection (primary endpoint incidence 47.3%). FTY720 was associated with lower creatinine clearance (month 12: 53.1, 56.0 vs. 65.1 mL/min; p < 0.001) and more macular edema cases (2.2% and 1.3% vs. 0%), whereas cytomegalovirus infections were higher with MMF (6.2% and 10.6% vs. 18.1% p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0139, respectively). FTY720 2.5 mg provided comparable rejection prophylaxis over 12 months versus MMF; however, FTY720 5.0 mg did not support a 50% reduction in cyclosporine exposure. The cause of macular edema cases and lower creatinine clearance with FTY720 in de novo transplantation needs further investigation.
The possibility of an effect of ethnicity on the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid, the immunosuppressive metabolite of the prodrug mycophenolate mofetil, was studied over 90 days following renal transplantation in African American (n = 13) and Caucasian patients (n = 20). Since renal dysfunction and time after transplant surgery are two factors known to alter mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics, two-way analysis of variance of the data at each time point with ethnicity and renal function status as covariates was used to evaluate the possibility of an ethnicity effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters. No statistically significant difference based on ethnicity was detected for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters, abbreviated mycophenolic acid area under the concentration-time curve (MPA AUC), or the predose trough concentration on study days 4, 7, 14, 28, or 90. A statistically significant decrease in MPA AUC and increase in oral apparent clearance were observed in renally impaired patients regardless of ethnicity on days 4, and 4 and 7, respectively. The suggested mechanism for these differences is uremia-induced increased MPA free fraction, leading to a temporary increased clearance for this restrictively cleared drug.
BACKGROUND: Alport syndrome is a hereditary disorder of basement membranes especially affecting the kidneys, ears, and eyes. Some patients who undergo renal transplantation lose their kidneys as a result of posttransplant anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease. METHODS: In the present study, we analyzed serum from 21 unselected Alport patients who underwent renal transplantation. Eleven samples were from patients without posttransplant anti-GBM nephritis, and 10 were from patients with this disease. RESULTS: Thirteen serum samples [10 alport posttransplant nephritis serum (APTN) and three Alport posttransplant serum (APT)] revealed linear binding to the GBM by indirect immunofluorescence. By using direct ELISA and immunoblotting with GBM constituents and type IV collagen NC1 domains from bovine, human, and recombinant sources, we detected anti-GBM antibodies in all Alport patients in varying titers. Five samples showed specific reactivity to the alpha3 chain, four to the alpha5 chain, six to both alpha3 and alpha5 chains, one to the alpha3 and alpha4 chains, and two to the alpha3, alpha4, and alpha5 chains of type IV collagen. The varied spectrum of reactivities was present equally in nephritic and non-nephritic sera. Ten control samples from non-Alport transplant patients did not exhibit specific binding to the GBM. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the absence of alpha3, alpha4, and alpha5 chains of type IV collagen in the Alport kidney leads to alloantibodies in all Alport patients who receive transplants, irrespective of whether they develop nephritis or not. Although all Alport transplant patients develop this humoral response, only a select few develop anti-GBM disease. We suggest that this difference could be attributable to a genotypic effect on the ability of some individuals to launch a cell-mediated immune response.
R EQUIREMENTS for establishing a dose individual-ization program for an immunosuppressant based on measurement of active drug concentration include availability of a validated analysis method; pharmacokinetic characterization of the drug; identification and characterization of drug metabolites; concentration-clinical response relationship information for active drug; a sampling time; and dosage adjustment strategy.Such suggested requirements are now available for mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).The following is a summary of the essential features of the suggested requirements and a description of an ongoing prospective investigation of a therapeutic drug monitoring strategy for MPA in renal transplant patients.
In the era of managed health care, the primary physician will be required to play an active role in the management of patients with early renal failure. This section provides a comprehensive and practical approach to the management of such patients. Early recognition of renal failure and monitoring its progression require an understanding of the pitfalls of commonly used diagnostic tests. Tight control of hypertension, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, and dietary protein restriction play important roles in delaying the progression of renal disease. Avoidance of additional renal insults such as nephrotoxic drugs and radiographic contrast prevents acceleration of renal demise. A variety of clinical manifestations, including dyselectrolytemias, hypertension, malnutrition, secondary hyperparathyroidism, and anemia may develop in patients with early renal failure. Timely referral to a nephrologist will facilitate planning for renal replacement therapy and may favorably affect eventual outcomes.
Induction immunosuppression with antilymphocyte antibodies has not been shown to improve cadaveric kidney allograft survival in randomized, controlled trials despite widespread use. This meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials assessed the effectiveness of induction therapy in prolonging allograft survival. Studies of induction therapy were identified in Medline (1986 through 1996), using the terms "monoclonal antibodies" or "antilymphocyte serum," and "kidney transplantation," "human," and "clinical trial." Bibliographies, pharmaceutical manufacturers, the United Network for Organ Sharing, National Institutes of Health, and study authors were also consulted. Seven of 247 identified studies met the following inclusion criteria: (1) an adult study population; (2) assessment of antilymphocyte antibodies in the immediate posttransplant period; (3) a control arm of cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone in the immediate posttransplant period; and (4) presentation of survival data. Two readers independently extracted protocol and survival data from each study. Summary odds ratios (fixed and random effects) and a rate ratio from proportional hazards regression at 2 yr were estimated to examine the effect of induction therapy on allograft survival. The summary odds ratios were both 0.66 (confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.96; P = 0.03), and the rate ratio was 0.69 (CI, 0.49 to 0.97; P = 0.03), indicating a beneficial effect of induction therapy on allograft survival. Allograft survival was 85.6% (CI, 82.1 to 89.1%) in the induction therapy group and 79.6% (CI, 75.6 to 83.6%) in the conventional therapy group. These results were stable in a sensitivity analysis based on study quality. Allograft survival was prolonged with induction therapy compared with conventional immunosuppression. These data indicate a potential role for the routine use of induction therapy in renal transplantation to optimize the survival of cadaveric allografts.
Exercise radionuclide ventriculography may unmask subclinical LV dysfunction in SLE; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical adoption.