The objectives of this research were to develop a Buddhist-based environmental education model for communities in Nonthaburi Province, Thailand. The specific objectives are 1) to analyse the communitys environmental context; 2) to assess the level of understanding of environmental education and Buddhist principles (the Four Noble Truths, the Three Characteristics of Existence, and the Threefold Training); 3) to create an integrated environmental education model grounded in Buddhist ethics and 4) To evaluate mentioned model efficiency by using mixed method of quantitative and qualitative research. Data were collected from 398 community members and 12 community leaders in Nonthaburi through questionnaires, surveys, and interviews. The models efficacy was assessed using Kirkpatricks evaluation framework, and data were analysed using mean, frequency, percentage, standard deviation (SD) and content analysis. Results revealed that most participants were men (74.12%), averaging 48 years old, married (43.22%), held bachelors degrees (43.70%), worked in agriculture (67.60%) and earned 5,00010,000 THB monthly (83.92%). Key environmental issues included wastewater (23.12%), solid waste (19.60%) and air pollution (17.09%). Participants demonstrated moderate understanding of environmental education and Buddhist principles. The proposed model comprises six components: 1) local leadership emphasizing community participation; 2) environmental education fostering human-environment interconnectedness; 3) environmental management promoting tangible engagement; 4) livelihood development balancing income and sustainability; 5) spiritual tourism for income and knowledge exchange and 6) Buddhist ethics for mental and life quality development. Feedback from 50 participants confirmed the models high efficacy in integrating Buddhist principles with environmental education, strengthening communities and advancing sustainable development.
Mekrajai et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: