Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of post-isometric relaxation (PIR) compared to self-stretching (SS) in working-age individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain. A parallel-group study was conducted with 50 patients who were randomized to either the self-stretching (SS, n = 25) or post-isometric relaxation (PIR, n = 25) group and received interventions three times a week for four weeks. In addition to these interventions, all patients were prescribed transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Outcome measures were neck pain, the neck disability index (NDI), hand grip strength (HGS), and cervical spine range of motion (ROM). Data were collected at baseline and after four weeks of outpatient rehabilitation. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine within-group differences, and an independent t-test compared between-group differences. There were no significant differences between the groups at baseline in neck pain intensity. Following both interventions, pain intensity and functional disability decreased, cervical spine ROM increased, and HGS improved (p < 0.05). Between-group analysis showed that participants in the PIR group achieved lower pain intensity (p = 0.032, Cohen’s d = 0.81), greater neck extension ROM (p = 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.96), and lower neck disability index (p = 0.004, Cohen’s d = 0.85) compared to the SS group. In conclusion, both PIR and SS interventions effectively reduced neck pain, increased range of motion, and decreased the neck disability index in working-age individuals. Neither technique showed superiority in increasing neck ROM and HGS. However, PIR was superior to SS in reducing neck pain and NDI, indicating potential benefits from integrating these interventions during treatment sessions.
Dudonienė et al. (Fri,) studied this question.