Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The exploration of regional architecture in the training of architectural professionals is considered as a crucial tool for engaging students in scientific research, fostering competent inquiry, analysis, assimilation, and acquisition of new information. The significance of research and graphic documentation of immovable heritage specimens is justified, emphasizing their application in architectural design methodology as sources of conceptual inspiration in the pursuit of novel forms and ideas. This contributes to expanding students’ professional competencies, refining artistic and technical skills in architectural graphics, understanding the sociocultural and environmental context of architecture, and instilling a civic stance towards the preservation of historical and architectural heritage. It also cultivates the ability to perceive, comprehend, and transform the code of national identity in the architect’s creative activity. In the professional sphere of urban planning, architecture, and design, the exploration of the characteristics of national identity through the lens of signs and symbols embedded in the traditions of ethnic architecture, along with the investigation and graphic documentation of regional architectural patterns, can serve as a significant factor of conceptual inspiration in the quest for forms and concepts. This is grounded in the reinterpretation and decoding of symbols in folk construction, transforming them into contemporary spaces. A thorough and practical acquaintance of architectural students with the traditions of regional construction, acting not only as indicators of folk architecture but also as expressions of the identity of place, the local color, cosmogony, worldview, and the lifestyle of a particular ethnic group, will contribute to the formation of a civic stance regarding the necessity of preserving the historical and cultural heritage, which is a component of national self-identification. It is crucial to describe and preserve tradition, to comprehend, reinterpret, transform, and reproduce the nation’s code in contemporary architectural language, utilizing quotes from regional architectural tradition while avoiding imitation and direct borrowing from traditional art and architecture.
Tetyana Skrypyn (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: