To support national carbon neutrality goals, enhancing the thermal insulation of building envelopes has emerged as a crucial strategy in reducing building energy consumption. This study conducted a detailed quantitative analysis of energy performance improvements achieved through enhanced insulation levels in four representative non-residential building types: office, accommodation, educational, and sales facilities. Based on four scenarios—Baseline (2019), Insulation Reinforced, Passive House, and Zero Energy Building (ZEB)—EnergyPlus simulations were performed to calculate end-use energy demand and consumption. The results revealed that office buildings achieved the highest improvement, with up to 34.7% energy reduction, while educational and sales facilities showed moderate and limited improvements, respectively. These findings provide quantitative evidence for prioritizing insulation-based policies and differentiated ZEB strategies tailored to each building type. The proposed RB models and scenario-based methodology offer a robust foundation for establishing future ZEB regulations and performance-based energy policies in South Korea. To ensure clarity, the study explicitly referenced verified data sources and field measurements. The IdealLoadsAirSystem used in the simulation assumes 100% system efficiency; thus, the reported outcomes represent building system loads rather than final energy consumption. The ZEB-level scenario analyzed in this study focuses on envelope and lighting improvements only, not on HVAC system optimization.
Jin et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: