Quantitative analysis demonstrates 34.7% energy reduction in insulated office buildings, suggesting enhanced insulation policy for ZEBs.
To support national carbon neutrality goals, enhancing the thermal insulation of building envelopes has emerged as a crucial strategy in reducing building energy consumption. This study conducted a detailed quantitative analysis of energy performance improvements achieved through enhanced insulation levels in four representative non-residential building types: office, accommodation, educational, and sales facilities. Based on four scenarios—Baseline (2019), Insulation Reinforced, Passive House, and Zero Energy Building (ZEB)—EnergyPlus simulations were performed to calculate end-use energy demand and consumption. The results revealed that office buildings achieved the highest improvement, with up to 34.7% energy reduction, while educational and sales facilities showed moderate and limited improvements, respectively. These findings provide quantitative evidence for prioritizing insulation-based policies and differentiated ZEB strategies tailored to each building type. The proposed RB models and scenario-based methodology offer a robust foundation for establishing future ZEB regulations and performance-based energy policies in South Korea. To ensure clarity, the study explicitly referenced verified data sources and field measurements. The IdealLoadsAirSystem used in the simulation assumes 100% system efficiency; thus, the reported outcomes represent building system loads rather than final energy consumption. The ZEB-level scenario analyzed in this study focuses on envelope and lighting improvements only, not on HVAC system optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: