This database contains the selected information for constructing the narrative of the paper "Where is Natural Capital being used in Policy-Making? Results from an international review". It includes 168 sources providing details on the scale, and location of implementation of the influencd policies, the policy area or domain, and the stage of the policy process (where possible). Additionally, it reports the "dominant" type of approach used (e.g., natural capital or ecosystem services), with details on qualitative or quantitative methods used to influence the policy debate. Notes on the type of influence on policy formulation and use are also provided. A classification of the impacts on policy making is proposed, following a modified approach proposed by Zolyomi et al. (2023). Ecosystem services as the silver bullet? A systematic review of how ecosystem services assessments impact biodiversity prioritisation in policy. Earth System Governance, 16, 100178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2023.100178 For more information on the interpretation of the variables extracted, please refer to the Legend reported in the shee N.2 of the Excel file. For details on the methods, selection of papers, and analysis, refer to the methodological section of the manuscript.
Martino et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: