Among outpatient hemodialysis patients in urban Japan, the prevalence of sarcopenia was 35.6%, dynapenia 28.8%, presarcopenia 5.1%, and 30.5% were controls.
Cross-Sectional (n=177)
Yes
In outpatient hemodialysis patients, dynapenia is highly prevalent (28.8%) and distinct from sarcopenia, highlighting the need for early detection using sex-specific functional assessments.
Absolute Event Rate: 35.6% vs 30.5%
Purpose This study aimed to classify patients undergoing outpatient hemodialysis into four groups (sarcopenia, dynapenia, presarcopenia, and controls) to clarify their distribution and compare clinical characteristics. Participants and Methods A total of 177 patients undergoing outpatient hemodialysis in the Tokyo urban area were classified into four groups according to skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) and muscle strength. Between-group comparisons were conducted for basic characteristics, body mass index, nutritional indicators, and body fat percentage. Results Among the 177 participants, the prevalence of sarcopenia, dynapenia, and presarcopenia was 35.6%, 28.8%, and 5.1%, respectively, and 30.5% were controls. Among participants, those with dynapenia were significantly younger and had higher SMI and than those with sarcopenia. Men participants with dynapenia also had higher extracellular-water to total-body-water ratio and markedly lower grip strength and Five Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test performance compared with controls. Among participants, those with dynapenia had significantly higher SMI and than those with sarcopenia and showed lower grip strength than controls. Conclusion Early detection of dynapenia may benefit from test batteries that takes sex differences into consideration.
Asano et al. (Thu,) conducted a cross-sectional in Outpatient hemodialysis patients in urban Japan (n=177). Among outpatient hemodialysis patients in urban Japan, the prevalence of sarcopenia was 35.6%, dynapenia 28.8%, presarcopenia 5.1%, and 30.5% were controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: