Bangladesh has experienced an unprecedented expansion of digital technologies over the past two decades, fundamentally transforming governance, economic activity, civic participation, and social interaction. As internet penetration, mobile connectivity, and digital public services have changed how citizens communicate, access information, and engage with the state, the Government of Bangladesh has enacted a series of cyber-related laws to regulate the digital space, prevent cybercrime, and safeguard national security. These laws include the Information and Communication Technology Act 2006, the Digital Security Act 2018, the Cyber Security Act 2023, and the Cyber Security Ordinance 2025. While these legal instruments were crafted in response to genuine concerns about cyber threats, misinformation, and digital crime, they have also generated sustained controversy over their compatibility with constitutional guarantees and international human rights obligations. This article critically analyzes the evolution of cyber governance in Bangladesh by closely examining how successive legislative reforms have affected fundamental human rights, including freedom of expression, privacy, and due process. Employing a mixed-method research design—combining doctrinal legal analysis, empirical data from regulatory agencies and civil society reports, and an extensive review of existing scholarship—the study finds that structural risks to digital rights persist. Based on these findings, the article argues that sustainable and democratic cyber governance in Bangladesh requires clearer legal definitions, robust judicial oversight, strengthened institutional accountability, comprehensive data protection laws, and greater alignment with international human rights norms.
Anupam Gope (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: