This study aims to experimentally evaluate and compare the electrical–thermal performance of a 20-cell 18650 lithium-ion battery pack cooled by a pure phase change material (PCM) and a PCM/TiO2 nanoparticle composite to identify an effective passive thermal management approach for EV battery applications. Using a controlled charging–discharging system, thermocouple-based temperature mapping, and systematic tests across multiple C-rates (0.75 C–1.5 C), the study measures the variations in battery temperature, generated heat, and voltage behavior as functions of depth of discharge (DOD) and state of charge (SOC). The results show that the PCM/nanoparticle mixture markedly improves thermal conductivity, reduces peak temperature by approximately 8–10 °C compared with pure PCM, delays thermal saturation at higher C-rates, and enables a wider safe DOD range with reduced voltage sag and lower heat accumulation. Based on the experimental temperature/voltage trends in this study, limit DOD to ≤40–50% at high power (≈1.5 C), ≤50–60% at moderate power (≈1 C), and ≤60–70% at low power (≈0.75 C) (i.e., target SOC windows roughly 60–100% SOC at 1.5 C, 40–100% SOC at 1 C, and 30–100% SOC at 0.75 C), with an absolute practical upper DOD limit of ~70% to avoid frequent deep discharge damage; these limits keep peak temperatures below ~40–45 °C, reduce severe voltage sag near cutoff, and greatly extend cycle life because shallower cycling (e.g., 50% vs. 100% DOD) produces many times more cycles. These improvements enhance battery safety, performance stability, and cycle life, making the nanoparticle-enhanced PCM a practical, compact, and energy-efficient solution for passive battery thermal management in electric vehicles.
Siricharoenpanich et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: