PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 7, 2026Eng—Advances in Engineering3 citationsOpen Access

SOC-Dependent Thermal Analysis of a 5P4S Lithium-Ion Battery Pack Using TiO2 Nano-Enhanced Phase Change Material Cooling

View Full Paper
ASAnumut SiricharoenpanichSES Eiamsa-ardPNPaisarn Naphon

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the thermal performance of lithium-ion batteries using pure phase change material versus one enhanced with TiO2 nanoparticles.
  • Evaluated a 20-cell 18650 lithium-ion battery pack under controlled conditions.
  • Employed thermocouples for temperature mapping during charging and discharging tests.
  • Conducted systematic tests across multiple C-rates from 0.75 C to 1.5 C.
  • The TiO2-enhanced phase change material reduced peak temperature by approximately 8–10 °C.
  • It delayed thermal saturation at higher C-rates, maintaining safer operation.
  • Established safe depth of discharge limits to extend battery cycle life and reduce voltage sag.

Abstract

This study aims to experimentally evaluate and compare the electrical–thermal performance of a 20-cell 18650 lithium-ion battery pack cooled by a pure phase change material (PCM) and a PCM/TiO2 nanoparticle composite to identify an effective passive thermal management approach for EV battery applications. Using a controlled charging–discharging system, thermocouple-based temperature mapping, and systematic tests across multiple C-rates (0.75 C–1.5 C), the study measures the variations in battery temperature, generated heat, and voltage behavior as functions of depth of discharge (DOD) and state of charge (SOC). The results show that the PCM/nanoparticle mixture markedly improves thermal conductivity, reduces peak temperature by approximately 8–10 °C compared with pure PCM, delays thermal saturation at higher C-rates, and enables a wider safe DOD range with reduced voltage sag and lower heat accumulation. Based on the experimental temperature/voltage trends in this study, limit DOD to ≤40–50% at high power (≈1.5 C), ≤50–60% at moderate power (≈1 C), and ≤60–70% at low power (≈0.75 C) (i.e., target SOC windows roughly 60–100% SOC at 1.5 C, 40–100% SOC at 1 C, and 30–100% SOC at 0.75 C), with an absolute practical upper DOD limit of ~70% to avoid frequent deep discharge damage; these limits keep peak temperatures below ~40–45 °C, reduce severe voltage sag near cutoff, and greatly extend cycle life because shallower cycling (e.g., 50% vs. 100% DOD) produces many times more cycles. These improvements enhance battery safety, performance stability, and cycle life, making the nanoparticle-enhanced PCM a practical, compact, and energy-efficient solution for passive battery thermal management in electric vehicles.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Siricharoenpanich et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69abc1b45af8044f7a4ea9a0https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7030122
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper