Randomized trial demonstrates improved thermal performance in cylindrical battery packs using PCM and nanoparticles, suggesting effective cooling solutions for electric vehicles.
Efficient thermal management is critical to ensuring the safety, performance, and lifespan of lithium-ion battery packs operating at high C-rates. This study presents a systematic experimental investigation of a passive battery thermal management system based on phase change materials (PCM) enhanced with thermally conductive nanoparticles (TiO₂ and Fe₃O₄). Five cooling configurations—air cooling, pure PCM, PCM–TiO₂ (0.25 vol%), PCM–Fe₃O₄ (0.25 vol%), and PCM–Fe₃O₄ (0.125 vol%)—were evaluated using a cylindrical 18650 battery module (5S × 4P) under operating conditions ranging from 0.75C to 1.75C at an ambient temperature of 27°C. The results demonstrate that conventional air cooling exhibits the poorest thermal performance, with maximum temperatures reaching 75–78°C at high C-rates. In contrast, PCM-based systems significantly suppress temperature rise, reducing peak temperatures to approximately 55°C (∼30% reduction). The incorporation of nanoparticles further enhances heat dissipation, with the PCM–TiO₂ system achieving a reduction of ∼33–34%, while the PCM–Fe₃O₄ (0.25 vol%) configuration delivers the best performance, achieving a maximum temperature reduction of ∼35–36% and improved thermal uniformity with temperature gradients limited to 4–7°C. Importantly, enhanced thermal regulation directly contributes to improved electrochemical performance, including increased voltage stability and extended discharge duration under high-load conditions. Unlike conventional hybrid cooling systems, the proposed approach offers a simple, fully passive, and energy-efficient solution that requires no pumps or external power. These findings highlight the strong potential of nanoparticle-enhanced PCM systems, particularly PCM–Fe₃O₄ composites, for practical implementation in electric vehicles and high-power energy storage applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siricharoenpanich et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: