The article examines the organizational-legal and procedural foundations of the state-legal mechanism as an integrated system of public governance designed to ensure the ordering of social relations and the stability of the legal regime. Drawing on doctrinal analysis, it conceptualizes the state-legal mechanism as the coordinated interaction of legal instruments, the competences of public authorities, and legal procedures that translate normative prescriptions into a reproducible pattern of law enforcement. The study substantiates the analytical value of distinguishing the legal mechanism from the state-legal mechanism and highlights the relevance of systemic features—integrity and integrative capacity—for explaining the functional effectiveness of public regulation. Particular attention is given to procedure as a guarantee of legal certainty, reviewability of decisions, and maintenance of legality, which is essential for sustaining trust in public authority and safeguarding the legitimate interests of participants in public-law relations.
Sergey Nikolaevich Khrameshin (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: