The institutions shaping AI governance are reproducing a pattern older than artificial intelligence itself: whoever writes the rules controls the technology. Drawing on direct experience of IMF and World Bank conditionality in 1990s Uzbekistan, this essay traces the structural mechanisms — rule-making concentration, extraction without representation, epistemic imposition — that make AI governance more difficult to correct than any previous cycle of internationally imposed standards. The Global South is not a geographic category but a structural position: consumption without design, subordination without representation, responsibility without control, sovereignty without material power. Essay 5 of the series Beyond Control: Theory of Limits of AI Governance by Oybek Khodjaev (INVEXI LLC, Tashkent, Uzbekistan). Full text: https://okhodjaev.com/essays/the-colonial-pattern/
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Oybek Khodjaev
Contextual Change (United States)
Contextual Change (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Oybek Khodjaev (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69e866896e0dea528ddeaec3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19661731