What question did this study set out to answer?

May 4, 2026Open Access

Graduated STA Control: Authority Governors and Runtime Deployment Architecture

Key Points

The aim is to specify the runtime deployment architecture for the STA pre-commitment controllability framework.
Introduces authority governors and commitment gates necessary for control
Details the sandboxing, rollback, fallback routing, and bypass testing strategies
Specifies logging requirements for accountability and transparency
Presents an architecture that integrates various control policies with human override mechanisms
Demonstrates the effectiveness of non-bypassable commitment gates in maintaining system integrity
Highlights the importance of pre-registered policies in ensuring reliable operations

Abstract

This record is Paper 3 of the Signal-Time-Authority (STA) Series. Paper 3 specifies the runtime deployment architecture for the STA pre-commitment controllability framework introduced in Paper 1: https: //doi. org/10. 5281/zenodo. 19980763 It complements the staged C++17 synthetic toy-simulation evidence reported in Paper 2: https: //doi. org/10. 5281/zenodo. 19984104 This paper focuses on authority governors, non-bypassable commitment gates, pre-registered piSTA policies, sandboxing, rollback, fallback routing, bypass testing, hysteresis, human override policy, and audit-log requirements. This is a PublicRelease v1. 0 record.

Read Full Paperexternally

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Htet Ko Ko Naing (Sat,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f836d93ed186a739980f7c https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19984351

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper