This article examines the issue of the limits of the using of artificial intelligence in civil proceedings. The author assesses the limits by identifying the scope of application of artificial intelligence in two areas of judicial activity: organizational and administration of justice in a causal sense. The author expresses his position on the applicability of artificial intelligence solely as an adviser to a judge which is not involved in the direct assessment of the circumstances of the case and the evidence presented.
Aleksey Yu. Staritsyn (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: