January 1, 2007
View Full PaperUpgrading from Single Chamber Right Ventricular to Biventricular Pacing in Permanently Paced Patients with Worsening Heart Failure: The RD‐CHF Study
Key Result
Upgrading from single right ventricular to biventricular pacing significantly improved NYHA functional class by 18%, 6-minute walk distance by 29%, and quality of life by 19% in advanced CHF.
Study Design
Type
RCT (n=56)
Blinding
Single-blind
Randomization
Cross-over
Structured PICO
Does upgrading to biventricular pacing improve functional status and echocardiographic measurements in permanently paced patients with worsening heart failure and ventricular dyssynchrony?
P
Population
56 patients with advanced congestive heart failure (NYHA functional classes III or IV despite optimal drug treatment), ventricular dyssynchrony (interventricular delay >40 ms or LV preejection delay >140 ms), and in need of pacemaker replacement.
I
Intervention
Biventricular (BiV) stimulation for 3 months
C
Comparator
Conventional, single right ventricular (RV) pacing for 3 months
O
Outcome
Functional status, arrhythmias, and standard echocardiographic measurementspatient reported
Upgrading from right ventricular to biventricular pacing significantly improves symptoms, exercise tolerance, and quality of life in chronically paced patients with advanced heart failure and mechanical dyssynchrony.
Abstract
Background: Biventricular (BiV) stimulation lowers morbidity and mortality in patients with drug‐refractory congestive heart failure (CHF), depressed left ventricular (LV) function, and ventricular dyssynchrony in absence of indication for permanent cardiac pacing. This pilot, single‐blind, randomized, cross‐over study examined the safety and efficacy of upgrading conventional pacing systems to BiV stimulation in patients with advanced CHF . Methods: We included 56 patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classes III or IV despite optimal drug treatment and ventricular dyssynchrony (interventriclar delay >40 ms or LV preejection delay >140 ms) in need of pacemaker replacement. We compared the patients' functional status, arrhythmias, and standard echocardiographic measurements during 3 months of conventional, single right ventricular (RV) versus 3 months of BiV stimulation . Results: There were 44 patients in the cross‐over phase. QRS duration was shortened by 23% and LV preejection delay by 16% with BiV stimulation. NYHA functional class, 6‐minute hall walk and quality of life score were significantly improved with BiV stimulation compared with single RV pacing by 18%, 29%, and 19%, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the ventricular arrhythmia burden or LV reverse remodeling between the 2 periods . Conclusions: This pilot study showed that upgrading from RV pacing to BiV pacing significantly improves symptoms and exercise tolerance in chronically paced patients with advanced CHF and mechanical dyssynchrony .