What does this research mean for the field?

Current research on non-dyadic Mobile Multi-Robot Systems interaction exhibits significant gaps regarding Manned-Unmanned Teaming and the use of consumer-off-the-shelf wearables, highlighting the need for standardized reporting frameworks to improve study replicability. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.SYNTHESIS. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

This review aims to explore and summarize how human-robot interaction paradigms apply to non-dyadic mobile multi-robot systems.

May 31, 2026

Non-dyadic Mobile Multi-Robot System Interaction: A Systematic Literature Review

Key Points

This review aims to explore and summarize how human-robot interaction paradigms apply to non-dyadic mobile multi-robot systems.
Systematic literature review using PRISMA methodology
Analysis of 2,314 peer-reviewed papers from ACM and IEEE repositories
Identification of gaps in the literature regarding human-robot interaction
Limited treatment of manned-unmanned teaming as an operational scenario was identified.
Consumer-off-the-shelf wearable devices are under-utilized as interaction paradigms.
A structured reporting framework was proposed to improve consistency and replicability in future studies.

Abstract

The increasing deployment of low-cost mobile robotic platforms offers transformative potential for addressing dull, dirty, and dangerous tasks across sectors such as defence, nuclear, logistics, and agriculture. Forecasts project the global multi-robot systems (MRS) market to exceed 5. 9 billion by 2028, driven by demand for scalable, autonomous solutions. As Mobile Multi-Robot Systems (MMRS) transition from research prototypes to operational assets, the design of effective human–robot interaction (HRI) becomes a critical enabler of safe, efficient, and mission-relevant deployment. Non-dyadic deployment, where the number of robots exceeds the number of human operators, is the natural extension to maximise benefit by delivering systems at increased scales. Thus, this paper is the first systematic review to focus on the application of HRI paradigms exclusively to non-dyadic MMRS. The systematic literature review employed the PRISMA methodology, analysing 2, 314 peer-reviewed papers sourced from ACM and IEEE repositories. This paper identifies three persistent gaps in the MMRS interaction literature: (1) the limited treatment of Manned-Unmanned Teaming (MUM-T) as an operational scenario, and (2) the under-utilisation of Consumer-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) wearable devices as viable interaction paradigms. Additionally, (3) the paper introduces a structured reporting framework to enhance consistency, replicability, and contextual richness in MMRS interaction studies, elevating the comparative and practical value of future work. Identified gaps, and the proposed reporting framework, are particularly salient in light of expanding global investment and the trajectory toward increasingly complex, cross-sector MMRS deployments. By supporting structured future research directions and enhancing reporting practices, this paper contributes to advancing the state-of-the-art in MMRS interaction, fostering more impactful and practically relevant research outcomes. For researchers and practitioners alike, this review provides a foundation for designing scalable multi-robot interaction that meets the demands of tomorrow’s autonomous systems, where human oversight must remain effective, as robot numbers grow.

KI fragen

Bookmark