Successful prophylactic catheter ablation of monomorphic VT reduced VT/VF episodes (16.1% vs 50.0%) and mortality (6.9% vs 11.8%) compared to no ablation attempt.
Cohort (n=151)
ICD/CRT-D and structural heart disease (n=151)
Prophylactic catheter ablation vs Failed ablation or not-attempted
VT/VF episodes, p=0.0001
Absolute Event Rate: 16.1% vs 50%
p-value: p=0.0001
Abstract Background Although the use of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy device with a defibrillator (ICD/CRT‐D) is the principal therapy for patients with life‐threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF), prophylactic VT ablation may reduce arrhythmic episodes and mortality in patients with an ICD/CRT‐D. In this retrospective study, the prognoses among patient groups with different results of attempted VT ablation were compared. Methods The study population consisted of 151 consecutive patients with an ICD/CRT‐D and structural heart disease. The mean age was 64±9 years, and 63 of the 151 patients were women. Of the 151 patients, 117 cases underwent catheter ablation procedure for elimination of monomorphic VT. The 151 patients were divided into 3 groups based on the results of the ablation or whether ablation was attempted, i.e., success, failure, and not‐attempted groups ( n =87, 30, and 34, respectively). The event rate of VT/VF and total mortality were compared among the 3 groups. Results During a follow‐up period of 31±22 months, VT/VF episodes and death occurred in 45 (30%) and 16 (11%) patients, respectively. When comparing the 3 groups, the rates of VT/VF episodes and death were significantly lower in the success group than in the failure and not‐attempted groups (16.1%, 46.7%, 50.0%, p =0.0001 and 6.9%, 20.0%, 11.8%, p =0.0213, respectively). Conclusion In patients with an ICD/CRT‐D implant for VT/VF, prophylactic ablation of monomorphic VT may reduce morbidity and mortality.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shinichi Niwano
Kitasato University
Jun Oikawa
Kitasato University
Hidehira Fukaya
Electrophysiology
Journal of Arrhythmia
Kitasato University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Niwano et al. (Wed,) conducted a cohort in ICD/CRT-D and structural heart disease (n=151). Prophylactic catheter ablation vs. Failed ablation or not-attempted was evaluated on VT/VF episodes (p=0.0001). Successful prophylactic catheter ablation of monomorphic VT reduced VT/VF episodes (16.1% vs 50.0%) and mortality (6.9% vs 11.8%) compared to no ablation attempt.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c7da04d97451bbd2fc4c5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joa.2013.05.003
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: