Introduction and Objective: Despite the proven benefits of DSMES, its utilization remains suboptimal. We aimed to assess the awareness and perceived understanding of DSMES among the ADA members. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was disseminated to Chairs of ADA’s 16 interest groups (IG) with a one-time request to distribute it to their respective IG members. All ADA members were included; incomplete surveys were excluded. The voluntary, anonymous 6-minute survey, developed by the ADA DSMES IG Leadership Team, comprised 25 open-ended and Likert-scale items (0=strongly disagree to 4= strongly agree), assessing awareness and perceived understanding of DSMES objectives, core activities, referral criteria, general benefits, and billing processes. Results: Over the course of 3 months, 61 (75.3%) provided complete data. Participants were predominantly white and female (72%), with 68.9% providing direct patient care; 19.7% reported prior DSMES involvement. The most common degrees were MD (29.5%) and RN (27.9%). Mean DSMES awareness was 2.97± 0.76 (0-4 scale), with perceived understanding of 61±29%. Mean confidence was 2.81±0.85 and modestly correlated with perceived understanding (r=0.46, p 0.001). Conclusion: While DSMES awareness was generally high, notable discrepancies between confidence and actual understanding underscore the need for strengthened DSMES education among healthcare professionals. Disclosure J.Y. Lee: None. R.O. Barber: None. J. D'Souza: None. C. Guinn: None. C.E. Johnstone: None. J. Saddanathan: None. M.D. Stancil: None. I. Stathaki: None. D. Stinnett: None. D. Ton: None. U. Quraishi: None.
LEE et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: